Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
You take turns plugging in each number for your answers. I’ll list them below.
6(0) - (0)2 = 0
6(1) - (1)2 = 4
6(2) - (2)2 = 8
6(3) - (3)2 = 12
6(4) - (4)2 = 16
6(5) - (5)2 = 20
6(6) - (6)2 = 24
The pattern I’ve noticed is every time you increase the value from the previous meaning for x, the solution increases by 4. I hope this helps and let me know if I’m right.
<span>Answer: a) Greater than or equal to 38 feet
b)Since there is no restriction on the perimeter there exists many possible values for the length of the deck.
Explanation: Given that the width of the deck is 29 ft.
and the perimeter of the deck is at least 134 ft.
134 = 2(length + width)
134 = (2 x length) + (2 x 29)
134 = (2 x length) + 58
2 x length = 134 - 58
2 x length = 76
length = 76 / 2
length = 38 ft
Thus, the inequality will be:
a)Length ≥ 38 ft
b)since there is no restriction on the perimeter there exists many possible values for length of deck.</span>
Answer:
1.6 is further to 0
Step-by-step explanation:
-1.5 is 1.5 units away from 0
1.6 is 1.6 units away from 0
There ya go
