1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
strojnjashka [21]
2 years ago
8

What are the potential concerns involving the stopped vehicle the officer may consider when approaching the vehicle?

Social Studies
1 answer:
s344n2d4d5 [400]2 years ago
6 0

When approaching a stopped car, an officer must be aware of various dangers such as an armed person inside or outside the car.

<h3>What is a danger?</h3>

A danger is a term that refers to a situation in which life, health, property, or the environment is threatened. It is characterized by the feasibility of the occurrence of a potentially harmful incident.

<h3>What dangers does an officer have with a stopped car?</h3>

When an officer sees a suspicious car stopped, she/he must be very careful when approaching it because there may be several dangers that threaten her/his life and her/his health. Some of these dangers can be caused by other people. There may also be danger in the car or other factors such as animals.

Some examples of dangers to officers when approaching a stopped car are:

  • The person inside the car is armed and is trying to shoot or hit the officer.
  • That the car be used as a decoy for the officer to approach and approach him from behind her.
  • That the car contains dangerous elements such as chemicals, explosives or inflammables that could put the officer at risk.
  • That under the car there is a dangerous animal such as a swarm of bees, a snake, scorpions, among others.

Therefore, the officer must remain calm, act carefully and approach slowly to be able to react to any movement.

Learn more about police officer in: brainly.com/question/27915574

#SPJ1

You might be interested in
Legislation is powerless to [eliminate] racial instincts or to abolish distinctions based upon physical differences.... If the c
vekshin1

Answer: The law cannot cause or correct social differences.

Explanation: Examining the passage above from a broader view connotes that racial instinct, thought or perception are borne from social differences between groups or communities such as race, gender, influence or wealth which helps nurture the thought that a social group or class is distinctly and significantly superior or better than others. The law can strike a balance in the civil and political rights pertaining to social groups. However, social differences such as race, gender and so on is not within the control of the law.

3 0
4 years ago
Jack is taking a class on Piaget, and as part of an assignment, he is "testing" some youngsters on various tasks. He gives four-
german

The correct answer is A. Class inclusion

Explanation:

Jean Piaget was an important Swiss psychologist mainly known for this theory of cognitive development that involved different stages and developments. In this theory "class inclusion" refers to the ability of children to consider an object or any other element can be included in multiple categories at the same time, for example, a dog can be classified into the category of animals, mammals, pets, domestic, etc. According to Piaget "Class inclusion" is mainly developed in the concrete operational stage (7 to 11 years) because before this, it is difficult for children to consider two aspects of an element at the same time and because of this, they are unable to recognize one element belongs to two categories.

This occurs in the case of four-year-old Meg because she does not consider marbles are classified within glass category and besides this, they can be either striped or white marbles. Instead, she considers glass category as different to marbles and because of this she believes neither strip or white marbles fit into the category of glass and therefore she answers there are more striped marbles.

5 0
3 years ago
How did the samoset and Squanto help the pilgrims
Mademuasel [1]
Samoset traded and was friendly and introduced Squanto who was basically the right hand man to a chief who facilitated peace with the pilgrims.
6 0
4 years ago
__________ is the fallacy of assigning two different meanings to the same significant word in an argument.
Vlad1618 [11]

Answer: composition

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which of the following was a defence alliance?
olga2289 [7]
The correct answer for this question is this one: "d. Both a and b." The triple alliance involved Germany, Austria-Hungary and Italy, while the Triple Entente contained Russia France and Britain. So the answer should include Triple Alliance and Triple Entente.

5 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Wes thinks that his boss favors his colleague nirupa over him. when the boss asks him to let nirupa know about a presentation, h
    6·1 answer
  • Why do wales and dolphins strand themselves in the same place in nz
    15·1 answer
  • ___ assert that students have different expectations in the school system depending on their social class, their racial/ethnic b
    8·2 answers
  • Explain why someone who is labeled as having a difficult temperament would have a difficulty forming relationships
    11·1 answer
  • ¿Qué es y qué hace un depredador?​
    7·1 answer
  • What kind of institutions started accepting girls in the late 1780s?
    8·1 answer
  • What is the significance of industry​
    9·1 answer
  • Terrell volunteers his time to campaign for Joel Goodman. He spent all afternoon putting up "Goodman for Congress" signs around
    6·1 answer
  • Japan and India both have democratic forms of government. Both countries have similarities and differences in their respective l
    14·2 answers
  • The caste system divides the members of India's society into
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!