Well, I am Russian, so you are getting this STRAIGHT from a source:
The two reasons were hunger and lack of medicine;
At that time, Russia's government were mostly dictators, and stole a LOT of food from the people, and a LOT of harvests & crops from the farmers for businesses;
Medicine was EXTREMELY expensive, and of course, the soldiers were treated WORSE than the people..........
So when they called for donations, the citizens BARELY were able to support themselves, so there was almost NOTHING to give to the soldiers!
Now, there were SOME food and medicine saved for soldiers, but it rationed QUITE QUICKLY!
So MANY soldiers were ill really fast, but due to the VERY skillful and useful techniques they learned to fight in the war, they still survived, (of course, there were soldiers who died too, but a MAJORITY of the Russians won).
I hope I helped, and PLEASE choose my answer as the Brainliest!
Thank you! =D
Answer:
Karnali Province
Explanation:
Karnali Province is the province in nepal that has least number of industries. The geography and climatic conditions of the Karnali province is the main reason for the decrease in the number of industries. The geography of Karnali province is consist of hilly mountains where industries can't be build. More number of industries can be installed by investing a lot of money as well as prvides facilities to its people so that increase occur in the population.
From 1838 to 1841 enacted many refrains with the aim of improving economic.
Answer:
b. informational social influence
Explanation:
Informational social influence is a psychological or social phenomenon that describes the tendency of an individual to accept the information of others we consider accurate and correct most especially when faced with ambiguity or obscurity. We simply conform to the opinions of others we believe have an accurate information we seem not to have. In such situation, we simply conform to what they are doing because we believe they are right.
When participants in an experiment conform to others' answers as explained in the scenario given in the question, we can infer that it best illustrates the <em>impact of informational social influence</em> rather than influence from peers.
