If you are driving 30 mph under ideal conditions , and you see a problem, you can stop in less than 100 feet. Hence, option D is correct.
<h3>What is the overall
stopping distance at 20 miles per hour?</h3>
In the 45 feet between perception and reaction, an automobile will move at 20 mph (30 feet per second x 1.5 seconds). After applying the brakes, the vehicle travels 64 feet in total, or around 19 feet, before coming to a stop.
When moving at less than 40 mph, you must maintain a minimum of one second of separation for every 10 feet your vehicle is long, according to the rule of seconds. If your speed is greater than 40 mph, add a second.
Thus, option D is correct.
For more details about stopping distance at 20 miles per hour, click here:
brainly.com/question/27655243
#SPJ4
Have an extended part of walking so móvil it y is higher, also they need to use resistant material on their ladders, supports etc. Like metal
The need to have a restricted area for people with no permission to be near
And they need special clothes
Answer:
Maya Lin's "Vietnam Veterans Memorial" is an example of an artist creating a place for a human purpose which is reminiscent of contemporary art form from human history.
Explanation:
This Memorial is situated in the Washington D.C, United States and it gives honor to the soldiers of the United States who fought in the Vietnam War. The establishment of this building or memorial is connected with many issues which have been the source of controversies, some of which have resulted in the takeover of the memorial area. Due to these controversies, this Vietnam Memorial is now made up of three parts.
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
