Answer:
if i'm not mistaken the answer is B
The researcher's scientific/alternative hypothesis is:
- Different sources of caffeine leads to differences in women's attentional control performance.
The researcher's null hypothesis is:
- Different sources of caffeine leads to no difference in women's attentional control performance.
The type of sample which the researcher is using is:
A disadvantage to using this sample type is:
The thing which the researcher can conclude about these data is:
- It is conclusive based on the reaction of the women to the independent variables.
If, in the population, women actually show NO difference in attentional control performance after drinking black tea versus coffee, the type of statistical error which the researcher has made is:
<h3>What is a Scientific Hypothesis?</h3>
This refers to the difference between two variables which is discovered during a scientific research and is an observed pattern.
Read more about scientific hypothesis here:
brainly.com/question/896413
Simplify -5x + 12 - 7x to -12x + 12
-12x + 12 = -3(5x + 8)
Expand
-12x + 12 = -15x - 24
Add 15x to both sides
-12x + 12 + 15x = -24
Simplify 12x + 12 + 15x to 3x + 12
3x + 12 = -24
Subtract 12 from both sides
3x = -24 - 12
Simplify -24 - 12 to -36
3x = -36
Divide both sides by 3
x = -36/3
Simplify 36/3 to 12
<u>x = -12</u>
Answer: Diego has 5 fewer counters.
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to find the answer, you need to find the difference between the amount of counters Dara has compared to Diego.
(Amount Dara has) - (Amount Diego has) = Difference
12 - 7 = 5
Diego has 5 fewer counters
