Noting gold, silver, and bronze medals for olympic athletes would be considered a form of _____ data.

Social Studies

1 answer:

Zolol [24]2 years ago

5 0

Noting gold, silver, and bronze medals for Olympic athletes would be considered a form of <u>ordinal</u> data.

An olympian is an athlete who competes (or has competed) within the Olympic video games (popularly called the Olympics), a global athletic competition proposing more than one sporting occasion among athletes representing the united states of America. The word is frequently capitalized.

Curiously, the variety among the countries with the biggest and smallest delegations is pretty huge. in keeping with the Washington submit, the group united states of America has 657 athletes, making them the largest institution in Tokyo, observed by means of Japan, the hosts, with 615.

There may be no particular age restriction for taking components in the Olympic games. This depends on each global sports activities Federation and the guidelines it lays down for its sport.

Learn more about the Olympics here brainly.com/question/15426234

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

President obama ordered bombing raids against a radical sunni group that had seized large parts of territory in

LekaFEV [45]

President Obama ordered bombing raids against a radical Sunni group that had seized large parts of the territory in Syria and Iraq.

This is further explained below.

<h3>What is Sunni group?</h3>

Generally, Sunni, from the Arabic word sunn, is a member of one of the two main branches of Islam, namely the branch that makes up the majority of members to that particular religion. In contrast to the Shiah, who are considered to be a minority denomination within Islam, Sunni Muslims consider their sect to be the more mainstream and orthodox branch of Islam.

In conclusion, A violent Sunni organization that had captured substantial portions of land in Syria and Iraq was the target of air attacks that were approved by President Obama.

Read more about Sunni group

brainly.com/question/3777018

#SPJ1

3 0

2 years ago

Why is it impossible from an individual to inherit a recessive condition if only one parent is a carrier for that condition

Jobisdone [24]

I added a picture of a badly-drawn cross as an example to help me explain. Let's say h is the recessive allele, in this case, that would cause a recessive condition. The heterozygous Hh parent is the carrier and they are being crossed with a homozygous dominant HH parent.

As you can see, all of the children are either homozygous dominants HH or heterozygous carriers Hh. None of the children can be homozygous recessive hh because there is not a recessive allele h to inherit from the other parent. Because H is dominant over h, the recessive condition won't be displayed.