Answer:
It allowes time for the seed to germinate
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer is below
Explanation:
Making use of Artifacts can be helpful in giving historical evidence or information, however, examining artifacts has its limitations on historical sources
Some of these limitations includes the following:
1. Analysis of Artifacts is not exact science: Often times, there exist subjective elements in the analysis and interpretation of the artifacts as different people, using the same artifact, may reach different conclusions
2. Often times, there is contradicting evidence: There are situation in which an artifact will yield evidence which contradicts with other findings that have been made on that artifact or similar artifacts.
3. Misidentification of Artifacts: There is possibility that a particular artifact has been misidentified.
4. Changes in Interpretation of the Evidence: There are situations in which the original interpretation of artifact was later changed. Thus, further investigation has caused a reversal of what was originally interpreted.
Summarily, Artifacts are limited as sources of history on America civilization pre 1600 due to lack of real use visualization and inaccurate placement. Often times, it is difficult to see how they were actually utilized and the place where we found them might not be the place where they were built or used.
I think the correct terms to fill in the blanks are androgen and males. The hormone androgen is produced in males, which some scientists speculate may lead to differences in male and female brain structure, and later variations in gender-related behaviors. It is a group of hormones that influences that development and the growth of the reproductive system of males. The most known hormone if this type id testosterone which is being produced by the testes. However, these substances are also found in women but only present in small amounts. Since too much of these hormones would lead to development of some male characteristics.
Answer and Explanation:
A. All the communities that Malala recognizes as a member are marginalized, ignored and socially devalued communities. All of these communities limited Malala's success in some way in any situation where she was inserted and for that reason, her success is so significant, because it was all these limitations that stimulated her to reach all the goals she had and has.
B. I believe that all the identities that Malala has are strong in the same intensity in any situation. This is because these identities are not just titles that she carries, but they are what she is, what makes up her construction as a human being.
C. This question is very personal and must be answered by yourself, about the way you see yourself and the role you play in the world. You can answer this question using the example of Malala and knowing yourself as belonging to some minority, such as blacks, women, Latinos, among others. You can also recognize yourself based on your culture and region of birth, your nationalism and even a specific community or lifestyle that you believe is impacting your life.
