Answer:
Explanation:
incorrect answer
a credit balance of $7500
correct answer
a debit balance of $7500.
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
Answer:
A. $96
B. $228
C. $42
Explanation:
A. Calculation to determine the Amount of SUTA tax the company must pay to Nebraska on Porter's wages
SUTA tax =$3,000 x 3.2%
SUTA tax = $96
Therefore the Amount of SUTA tax the company must pay to Nebraska on Porter's wages is $96
B. Calculation to determine the Amount of sUTA tax the company must pay to Michiganion Porter's wages
SUTA tax =($9,000 - $3,000 )x3.8%
SUTA tax =$6,000 x 3.8%
SUTA tax = $228
Therefore the Amount of SUTA tax the company must pay to Nebraska on Porter's wages is $228
C. Calculation to determine the Amount of the net FUTA tax on Porters wages
Net FUTA tax=$7,000 limit) x 0.6%
Net FUTA tax = $42
Therefore the Amount of SUTA tax the company must pay to Nebraska on Porter's wages is $42
Answer:
a. $30,000.
Explanation:
Willingness to pay is the highest amount a consumer would be willing to pay for a good or service. In this example, the willingness to pay is $50.
Consumer surplus is the difference between price of a product and the willingness to pay.
To calculate the total consumer surplus , refer to the attached image, the consumer surplus is the shaded triangle.
The total consumer surplus = 1/2 base × (height)
The height is the difference between the willingness to pay and the price of the wine = $50 -$30 =$20
The base is the total quantity purchases at $30 =
1/2 × 3 × ($20) = $30
There are 10,000 consumers, therefore consumer surplus =$30,000
I hope my answer helps you.
Answer:
a) DuPont analysis for Johnson International
2013: 0.059 x 2.11 x 1.75 = 0.2179 = 21.79%
2014: 0.058 x 2.18 x 1.75 = 0.2213 = 22.13%
2015: 0.049 x 2.34 x 1.85 = 0.2121 = 21.21%
b) DuPont analysis for industry averages
2013: 0.054 x 2.05 x 1.67 = 0.2121 = 21.21%
2014: 0.047 x 2.13 x 1.69 = 0.1692 = 16.92%
2015: 0.041 x 2.15 x 1.64 = 0.1446 = 14.46%
c) Johnson International's drivers follow the same tendency as the industry's average, e.g. net profit margin decreased in a similar manner, and total asset turnover increased also in a similar manner to the industry's average. The only driver that doesn't follow the industry's trend is financial leverage. While other companies in the same industry decreased their financial leverage, Johnson increased it. You should further analyze why this happened and what are the potential consequences.
Explanation:
The DuPont analysis is used to break down ROE into 3 different components and that way you can analyze whether a company's high ROE comes along with a high risk. The following formula is used to calculate ROE based on 3 different factors:
R
OE = net pro
fit margin x total assets turnover x financial leverage
