Answer:A. Leontief assumed that U.S. and foreign technologies were the same, while the Heckscher-Ohlin model assumes they are different
B. Leontief ignored land abundance in the United States
D. Leontief’s test distinguished between skilled and unskilled labor, but ignored capital.
Explanation:Leontief paradox is a Russian-American economist, his work was based on the work of Wassily W. Leontief he attempted to test the Heckscher–Ohlin theory ("H–O theory") empirically.
in economics tries to explain that a country with a higher capital per worker has a lower Capital per labor ratio in export than when compared to Import.
LEONTIEF IGNORED THE ABUNDANCE OF LAND IN MAKING HIS ASSUMPTIONS
HE ALSO CLASSIFIED THE U.S TECHNOLOGY AND OTHERS AS THE SAME WHICH IS NOT IN LINE WITH THE H-O MODEL ASSUMPTION.
LEONTIEF THEORY IGNORED CAPITAL DURING HIS TEST.
The appropriate response is staffing pattern. The staffing administration design gives the organized procedures to recognize persistent needs and afterward to convey the staff assets as productively and viable as could be expected under the circumstances. A viable arrangement initially concentrates on balancing out the unit center staffing. A staffing example, or center scope, is resolved through a gauge workload and a prescribed care standard.
Answer:
The initial deposit should be $ 25.46
Explanation:
The Annuity formula is
P=R [1−(1+i)^-n/i]⋅(1+i)
Where
P= Initial deposit
R=Regular Withdraw amount
i=Interest rate
n=Number of years/periods
After entering corresponding values in the formula we get $25.46
so P (which is our initial deposit)=25.46
Answer:
B. homogenous products pass through a series of processes and receive similar amounts of materials, labor, and overhead
Explanation:
Answer
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Step-by-step explanation:
You will find the procedures, formulas or necessary explanations in the archive attached below. If you have any question ask and I will aclare your doubts kindly.
