The answer to your question is b
<span>The positivists saw it this way. Positivism is a theory that believes certain types of knowledge is based on the properties and relationships of natural phenomena. Information that is gotten from sensory experiences is then interpreted logically and creates a certain type of knowledge.</span>
This group member is exhibiting "<span>social loafing."
Social loafing alludes to the idea that individuals are inclined to apply less exertion on an assignment on the off chance that they are in a gathering versus when they work alone. Working in bunches is normally observed as an approach to enhance the achievement of an undertaking by pooling the aptitudes and abilities of the people in that gathering. </span>
Answer:
a). DOES
b). DOES NOT
Explanation:
A fallacy is the reasoning which is logically incorrect, it undermines the logical validity of the argument, and is also recognized as unsound. It is the use of the invalid reasoning or faulty reasoning in the construction of an argument.
In the context, it is given that every time the fire station's alarm rings, I understand that fire has broken out somewhere nearby. And if one needs to stop the risk of fire, then one should prohibit sounding the alarm of the fire station.
Thus this statement is the false reasoning and is logically incorrect. Sounding of the alarm does not causes the fire. So it does commit a fallacy and it does not commit an appeal to ignorance fallacy.