The correct answer is Open Boarders
Explanation:
In a debate, there are two or more positions about a specific situation or issue. Additionally, each of these positions is supported by participants using arguments that can include facts, statistics, citations, among others. In the case of the immigration debate, one of the sides or positions is that immigrants should not be restricted from entering the country and therefore immigration should be considered as negative. Supporters of this side propose migration can help the economy of the country, promotes inequality, and can reunite families. Therefore, the opinion the government should promote family reunification as part of immigration is part of the Open Borders side that promotes reducing or ending for immigrants.
The major concern of scientists who left Nazi Germany for the states before ww2 was that a new Nazi would heavily persecute the Jews ,many of whom held positions in the realm of science
Based on the quote, critics of NAFTA might have claimed that:
A) Mexican workers would be unfairly taken advantage of
<h3>What can be deduced about the critics of NAFTA from the text?</h3>
The critics of NAFTA believe that Mexico was not as strong as the other countries who entered the trade agreement so the possibility that they will be taken advantage of was there.
Having read the above statement from the 1993 agreement of NAFTA, we can see that the reference to the United Mexican states must have proved that the union was needed to stand side by side with the American and Canadian states.
Critics might have believed that Mexico was vulnerable and could be unfairly taken advantage of in the deal.
Learn more about NAFTA here:
brainly.com/question/27372794
#SPJ1
Well, before the renaissance people of all ranks were able to just read the bible. Serious studies were saved for men only and thought to be unnecessary to women and harmful to a women's weaker mind
The major reason why the Articles of Confederation were too "weak" was because they gave the central government no power to tax the individual states--meaning that the US could not repay its war debt.
