We are given with the data: A = <span>$6,951.20 per semi-annum that is $13902.4 per annum, i equal to 1.75% compounded semi-annually, and asked for P or the present worth to maintain the withdrawal for 15 years.
the formula to be used is attached in the file (third one). substitute the i = 0.0175, n = 30, A = </span>$13902.4 and get P.
Answer:A. Leontief assumed that U.S. and foreign technologies were the same, while the Heckscher-Ohlin model assumes they are different
B. Leontief ignored land abundance in the United States
D. Leontief’s test distinguished between skilled and unskilled labor, but ignored capital.
Explanation:Leontief paradox is a Russian-American economist, his work was based on the work of Wassily W. Leontief he attempted to test the Heckscher–Ohlin theory ("H–O theory") empirically.
in economics tries to explain that a country with a higher capital per worker has a lower Capital per labor ratio in export than when compared to Import.
LEONTIEF IGNORED THE ABUNDANCE OF LAND IN MAKING HIS ASSUMPTIONS
HE ALSO CLASSIFIED THE U.S TECHNOLOGY AND OTHERS AS THE SAME WHICH IS NOT IN LINE WITH THE H-O MODEL ASSUMPTION.
LEONTIEF THEORY IGNORED CAPITAL DURING HIS TEST.
Answer:
The answer to this question is Option A. Dave's production function change
Explanation:
production function refers to the functional relationship between the quantity of a good produced (output) and factors of production (inputs).
The expansion of Dave's Dogs will cause its production function to change as a result of increase in the quantity of goods produced and an increase in the factors of production employed.
Hence the answer is A. Dave's production function change
Scarcity is to not have enough resources to fullfil a societies wants and needs. The 3 basic questions a society must ask inorder to deal with this are. what to produce? how to produce? and, for whom to produce? whoever answers those questions is how I societies economic system is decided. Though to answer your question in short, the basic goal of a society is to deal with scarcity, they achieve this by producing as much resources as possible with the little resources available.
Answer:
NOT might lose customers because of a lack of innovation
NOT might not be able to attract essential new investors
Explanation:
Since in the question it is mentioned that Samantha who has a bakery is sucessfully run for a year and it is popular also. At the same time she planned for using her profits in order to cover up the similar cost that had done in the last year
So based on this, the risk she has taking is that she not want to lose his customers as there is an innovation lacking also she is not capable to attract the new investors
Therefore the same is to be considered
