The first meeting of the South Carolina Assembly in the Charleston State House occurred in 1756. In 1786 the South Carolina Assembly voted to move the state capital to columbia a more geographically, centralized location.
The answer is A.<span>concurring opinion supports a Supreme Court ruling, while a dissenting opinion opposes it
In concurring opinion, the judges will support the the decision by the court but with different basis/reasonns for its support.
In dissenting opinion on the hand, the judges are disagree with the decision by the court, but it wouldn't affect the previous outcome.</span>
Answer: C & D
Explanation: In the context above, there is no scientific correlation or relationship between ice cream and level of temper. The observed association may be either due to mere coincidence, that is, moment whereby reduction in temper of the subject or participant is witnessed aligns with the the time at which ice-cream is consumed. Coincidental relationships have no scientific relationship and are not fixed, as they usually occur rather naturally in varying circumstances.
The observed correlation might also be due to a confounding or third variable which isn't part of our data but impacting our data, hence, resulting in the observed relationship.
The correct answers are treatment; depression levels.
Answer 1: The independent variable (IV) in this study is the treatment the clients receive; that is, whether or not they received <span>cognitive-behavioral treatment. An IV is an experimental variable in a study that is controlled and manipulated in order to measure its effects on dependent variables or outcomes.
Answer 2: </span>The dependent variable (DV) in this study is the clients' depression levels. DVs refer to outcome variables or results that are obtained as a result of manipulating an IV. In this instance, the manipulation of the IV (whether the participants received cognitive-behavioral treatment or were instead wait-listed) led to the DV- clients' depression levels. Specifically the researchers were investigating whether receiving the treatment had an influence on clients' depression levels.
A movement which is used to try and change a policy or something they thing is wrong.