Answer:
A Place to stay
Explanation:
First he needs to find a place to stay as a homeless shelter if he has money in his bank he can rent an appartement or a hotel just till he can find a job if he dose not have money he can go to a homeless shelter.
Answer:
god knows
Explanation:
idj uwehehdjdjhddhddjdjdjdddjdjdjddjjdd am bullying u because I don't know lol ejejeueuuewiwiwiwiiwiwwiwiwiwiwiwjwjwjwjjwjejdjd
The first 8 amendments stated Criminal Prosecutions, and citizen's restrictions. (for the most part). These all were fair rights that essentially founded the standpoint for the laws of today. Since these were the first amendments. Congress had to get the important and obvious ones out of the way first. This means they are important to the US and it's way of function.
With the case study given above, it may be ascertained that,
- The want to avoid 'The CSI Effect' is a non-discriminatory reason to eliminate the jurors in general, as it does not conflict to any social discrimination based upon gender, race or other such factors;
- Furthermore, it is to be assumed that 'The CSI Effect' is directly tied to age as per the beliefs of Angela, and involves social discrimination based on the age of jurors.
<h3>What is social discrimination?</h3>
Any discriminative act, which directly relates to a biased behavior based upon the factors such as age, race, gender, ethnicity, and other such factors contained under Constitution lead to social discrimination.
As per the beliefs of Angela, her act of wanting to avoid 'The CSI Effect' conflicts a social discrimination for young jurors only, and not in general, as it is a discrimination of age.
Hence, the significance of social discrimination is aforementioned.
Learn more about social discrimination here:
brainly.com/question/13964317
#SPJ1
I think it is true :) hope this helps
