Answer:
Since the United States was established there was always a great importance to maintain a relationship between both the states and the nation, both politically and economically. In the late 1700's to the early 1800's, George Washington's treasurer, Alexander Hamilton, had opted for a "Bank of the United States", which was fully within Congress's authority. He was wanting the bank to circulate and print paper money and expand economic development. This was eventually signed into legislation and a national government was created. The Bank taxed both the states and the nation as a whole. The Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, did not support the national bank nor did his supporters, the Jefferson Democratic-Republicans. The bank's charter expired in 1811, and the supporters along with Jefferson wanted to block its renewal. This lead to various questions and conflicts such as "Could Congress charter a national bank?" or "Could the federal government tax the states?" The Barron vs Baltimore case ("James McCulloch, an agent for the Baltimore branch of the Second Bank, refused to pay a tax that Maryland had imposed on all out-of-state chartered banks") declared that the Bill of Rights could NOT restrict the powers of the state governments. After this, there was a rise of dual federalism. Dual federalism was the states and national government exercising exclusive authority in distinctly delineated spheres of jurisdiction. Then there was a rise of cooperative federalism, which was when both levels of government coordinated their actions to solve national problems, such as the Great Depression. Then came an era of new federalism which is what the nation uses today. By decentralizing policies, authority can blend between the national, state and local governments.
Explanation:
The first questions answer is c
Answer:
When there are insufficient jurors voting one way or the other to deliver either a guilty or not guilty verdict, the jury is known as a “hung jury” or it might be said that jurors are “deadlocked”. The judge may direct them to deliberate further, usually no more than once or twice.
Answer:
<h2>It would encourage fair and right practice in resolving criminal cases.</h2>
Explanation:
- The principles of Ubuntu emphasize on the practice of<u> moral goodness and believes in the essence of fairness and social justice</u>. It also encourages <u>compassion, love, tolerance, and other humane values.</u>
- Applying these values in the criminal justice system would <u>encourage fair and right practice in resolving criminal cases</u>. As we know there have been numerous cases of unfair practice and punishment in the criminal justice system, the need to apply the principles of Ubuntu becomes very important.
- It would ensure justice to victims as well as incorporate right punishments to the offenders.
