This question is incomplete because the options are missing; here is the complete question:
Nomadic societies negatively impact the environment more than industrial societies.
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
True
False
The answer to this question is False
Explanation:
First human societies were nomadic, this means to obtain sources such as food, shelter, or water, groups moved from one area to another. This lifestyle had fewer negative effects on the environment in comparison to modern industrial societies. This is because industrial societies rely on exploiting natural resources and manufacturing processes to create new products. These two factors lead to the depletion of natural resources and the increase of pollution as chemicals are released as part of production, which does not occur in nomadism. In this context, industrial societies negatively impact the environment more than nomadic societies, therefore the statement is false.
Answer: C. No, because all residents could reasonably be notified by mail.
Explanation:
The notice was not Constitutional because there should be a reasonable chance that every defendant has gotten the notice of the suit and they will not be able to do this unless notified individually.
This is why the court should have at least used mail to reach out to them because with mail, there is a reasonable chance that every defendant would be notified.
lol, u just copied someone's answer
anyway, banks can change the savings stored in banks and make them have a greater interest. Banks are also able to loan money, which becomes an exchange with the public as we need to repay the loans banks give us.
:)))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
In a series of Supreme Court rulings under Chief Justice Earl Warren, beginning with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, "separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional because new research demonstrated that separating students by "race" was detrimental to them, even if facilities were equal.
<h3>Which Supreme Court decision caused the separate but equal concept to be abolished?</h3>
- The separate but equal theory was abolished as a result of the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court ruling.
- The 1954 Supreme Court decision Brown v. Board of Education, which overturned the "separate but equal" principle and ordered an end to school segregation, is one of the most well-known decisions to come out of this time period.
- "Separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional in a series of Supreme Court decisions made under Chief Justice Earl Warren, starting with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, because new research showed that dividing students by "race" was harmful to them even if facilities were equal.
- "Separate but equal" facilities were found to be unconstitutional in a series of Supreme Court decisions made under Chief Justice Earl Warren, starting with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, because new research showed that dividing students by "race" was harmful to them even if facilities were equal.
To learn more about the Brown v. Board of Education Supreme Court, refer to the following link:
brainly.com/question/9822748
#SPJ4
