The answer is, To argue for, there's the obvious, which is that the colonists didn't
like their lack of voice within British Parliament. They also didn't
like how Britain was treating other colonies, what would become Canada
for instance, with similar laws and codes seen in the US colonies. You
could also argue that it was a more financial decision, as the taxes
placed upon the colonies and the restrictions on trade were hurting
American businesses. Honestly, an argument combining the two would
probably be more rounded.
San Antonio was the seat of power for the Tejas area. Even though, Texas was not an individual state (it was part of the larger state of Coahuila y Tejas) it still had and did many of the things that other states did. THE size and population of Texas demanded that it have a more local regional government than the one located hundreds of miles away in Coahuila. The city became even more sought after during the Revolution. Santa Anna thought that taking San Antonio would help to squash the rebellion. However the Battle of the Alamo became an inspiration for the Texians and Tejanos fighting for freedom.
The protective tariff was an economic cause of the increased tension between the North and the South.
Economically, the North had a lot of factories and had become industrialized. The south on the other hand still depended heavily on Agriculture.
High protective tariffs were placed on foreign goods to favor the Northern Industries. This meant that people had to buy more from the North.
This tariff favored the North but caused greater burden on the South who had to pay more for goods that they imported from Europe.
In conclusion the protective tariffs helped to boost the economy in the North while hurting t the south.
read more on brainly.com/question/24380171?referrer=searchResults
Hi!
I believe the answer is: Arabia.
