<span>The role of Monroe Doctrine in the history of the United States of America. ... and for the Western Hemisphere had been launched before Monroe's address to ... In July, 1823, Adams made hisconcerns known to Russian minister in Washington. .... we have never taken any part, nor does it comport with our policy so to do.</span><span>
</span>
Considering the available options, the statement that best support evidence that Thomas Jefferson was an Anti-
Federalist is "<u>Jefferson authored the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom."</u>
<h3>What is Anti-Federalist?</h3>
Anti-Federalist is a disposition or belief that states and individuals should have more rights and independence than the national government.
<h3>How Anti-Federalist is Similar to Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom</h3>
Like Anti-Federalist belief, the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom promotes states affairs to be separated from church and individual rights and freedom to practice his religion as he wishes without being forced.
Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom was written by Thomas Jefferson and was enacted in 1786.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded ty the correct answer is option D.
Learn more about the Virginia Statute of Religious Freedom here: brainly.com/question/14990854
The Nazi death camps in chronological order are: Chelmno, Belzec, Sobibor, Treblinka, Majdanek and Auschwitz-Birkenau. In 1941 the Chelmno camp was opened in Poland, soon followed in 1942 were Belzec<span>, </span>Sobibor<span>, and </span>Treblinka. The largest death camp was opened in 1943 and was known as Auschwitz-Birkenau,
I believe the correct answer is "Personal piety should be infused into every part of life"
James Madison played a great role in establishment of the US as a republic. During the writing of the constitution, the founding fathers were adamant that they wanted democratic system of governance. However, they were torn between a direct democracy and a republican democracy. James Madison dismissed a direct democracy since the US is a large country and thus impossible to be governed through direct pure democracy. Instead, the father of the constitution argued for a scheme of representation in a republican setting. He especially lauded such a government since it even catered for the rights of the minority than in direct democracies.