Ask question

Ask question

All categories

2 years ago

5

A 7-digit telephone number has the form abc - xxxx, where x, b, and c can be any digit 1 - 9 and a is restricted to 3 - 9. how m

any numbers are possible?

1 answer:

9966 [12]2 years ago

6 0

The total 7-digit telephone numbers has the form abc-xxxx which are possible are 3,720,087

It is given that,

A 7-digit telephone number has the form = abc - xxxx

Also, x, b, c can have any digit between 1-9

And, a is restricted to between 3-9

We need to find the possible number of combinations of a 7-digit telephone number having the form abc-xxxx

Then, number of digits that can be placed at the place of 'a' = 7 type of digits (3 to 9)

Number of digits that can be placed at the place of x, b and c= 9 type of digits (1 to 9)

Suppose, we put a number from 3 to 9 at 'a', so total possibilities are 7

Similarly, at 'b' we put a number from 1-9, so total possibilities are 9 and so on so forth

Thus total 7-digit telephone numbers which have the possible combinations can be

= 7*9*9*9*9*9*9

= 3,720,087

To learn more about number, here

brainly.com/question/17429689

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Math help on questions #4 and #5

Vanyuwa [196]

<h3>Answer:</h3>

4. -3

5. 3

<h3>Step-by-step explanation:</h3>

4. For x > -2, the value of a is the slope of the line. The line goes down 3 units for each 1 to the right, so the slope is -3/1 = -3. Then a = -3.

___

5. The ordered pair (h, k) is typically used to name the point to which a function is translated. The vertex of the function f(x) = |x| is (0, 0). When it is translated to (h, k), the function becomes ...

... q(x) = |x -h| +k

If the new vertex is (3, 0), then h = 3 and k = 0. This is consistent with the equation shown. (k = 0 means q(x) = |x -h|.)

7 0

3 years ago

Which could be the name of a point?

lakkis [162]

I believe the answer is A or C because capital letters are used to name a point

6 0

3 years ago

Assume {v1, . . . , vn} is a basis of a vector space V , and T : V ------> W is an isomorphism where W is another vector spac

Degger [83]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

To prove that $w_1,\dots w_n$ form a basis for W, we must check that this set is a set of linearly independent vector and it generates the whole space W. We are given that T is an isomorphism. That is, T is injective and surjective. A linear transformation is injective if and only if it maps the zero of the domain vector space to the codomain's zero and that is the only vector that is mapped to 0. Also, a linear transformation is surjective if for every vector w in W there exists v in V such that T(v) =w

Recall that the set $w_1,\dots w_n$ is linearly independent if and only if the equation

$\lambda_1w_1+\dots \lambda_n w_n=0$ implies that

$\lambda_1 = \cdots = \lambda_n$ .

Recall that $w_i = T(v_i)$ for i=1,...,n. Consider $T^{-1}$ to be the inverse transformation of T. Consider the equation

$\lambda_1w_1+\dots \lambda_n w_n=0$

If we apply $T^{-1}$ to this equation, then, we get

$T^{-1}(\lambda_1w_1+\dots \lambda_n w_n) =T^{-1}(0) = 0$

Since T is linear, its inverse is also linear, hence

$T^{-1}(\lambda_1w_1+\dots \lambda_n w_n) = \lambda_1T^{-1}(w_1)+\dots + \lambda_nT^{-1}(w_n)=0$

which is equivalent to the equation

$\lambda_1v_1+\dots + \lambda_nv_n =0$

Since $v_1,\dots,v_n$ are linearly independt, this implies that $\lambda_1=\dots \lambda_n =0$ , so the set $\{w_1, \dots, w_n\}$ is linearly independent.

Now, we will prove that this set generates W. To do so, let w be a vector in W. We must prove that there exist $a_1, \dots a_n$ such that

$w = a_1w_1+\dots+a_nw_n$

Since T is surjective, there exists a vector v in V such that T(v) = w. Since $v_1,\dots, v_n$ is a basis of v, there exist $a_1,\dots a_n$ , such that

$a_1v_1+\dots a_nv_n=v$

Then, applying T on both sides, we have that

$T(a_1v_1+\dots a_nv_n)=a_1T(v_1)+\dots a_n T(v_n) = a_1w_1+\dots a_n w_n= T(v) =w$

which proves that $w_1,\dots w_n$ generate the whole space W. Hence, the set $\{w_1, \dots, w_n\}$ is a basis of W.

Consider the linear transformation $T:\mathbb{R}^2\to \mathbb{R}^2$ , given by T(x,y) = T(x,0). This transformations fails to be injective, since T(1,2) = T(1,3) = (1,0). Consider the base of $\mathbb{R}^2$ given by (1,0), (0,1). We have that T(1,0) = (1,0), T(0,1) = (0,0). This set is not linearly independent, and hence cannot be a base of $\mathbb{R}^2$

8 0

3 years ago

PLease help meeeeeeeeeeeeee

lys-0071 [83]

Answer:The first one is a line segment the second one is a ray and the 3rd one is a line

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Anyone’s know the answer??

vaieri [72.5K]

Answer:

y = 3/2x + 5/2

Step-by-step explanation:

7 0

3 years ago