1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
dalvyx [7]
2 years ago
14

How could installing new technology, such as scrubber machines, affect the factories required to install them? name a positive a

nd a negative consequence.
History
1 answer:
icang [17]2 years ago
3 0

Scrubbers, a new technology, will help manufacturers reduce their toxic emissions. Although this contributes to increasing worker and neighborhood safety, installing this pricey technology takes time and effort.

<h3>Positive and negative consequences of new technology</h3>
  • The good thing about the Industrial Revolution was that it gave rise to equipment that enhanced production techniques and accelerated what was then known as mass manufacturing.
  • During the Industrial Revolution, numerous fabrics were constructed, and the proprietors provided numerous jobs to run the new machinery.
  • The manufacture of commodities was hastened and increased by mass production.
  • Many people relocated to the big cities where the industries were to start new lives after leaving the rural portions of the country.
  • Although there were numerous occupations available throughout the Industrial Revolution, they were often low-paying positions, which was one of its drawbacks.
  • Workers in the fabrics also endured difficult and unhealthy working conditions.
  • Operating equipment resulted in numerous accidents. Due to their poverty and need to survive, a great number of immigrants moved to these big cities where they lived in cramped quarters.
  • There were so many people crammed into tight spaces, making sanitation and disease transmission major issues.

To learn more about the Impact of new technology visit:

brainly.com/question/26751412

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
During the 1700s, the British government used mercantilism to: *
xenn [34]

Answer:

Supply for the mother country by putting limits on goods the colonists could buy or sell, whose ships they could use, and who they could trade with.

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Why did humanists blend their ideas with Christian ideas?
Ray Of Light [21]

Answer:

They were mostly leaders of the Christian faith.

Explanation:

The humanists blended their ideas with Christian ideas because most of them were Christian leaders anyway.

They also used the argument that a divine God sent Jesus to earth in his human form to come and save mankind which gave their humanistic ideas a major boost.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the british parliament impose taxes on the colonists after 1763
shtirl [24]

Answer:

HUGE DEBT BURDENS

Explanation:

in the aftermath of the 7 years war, the British government was heavily indebted from financing the war. Having failed to continue taxing their homeland, they resolved to tax the colonists to raise much needed funds with huge repercussions.

3 0
4 years ago
Where did the worlds first democracy develop?​
motikmotik

Answer:

The concepts (and name) of democracy and constitution as a form of government originated in ancient Athens circa 508 B.C.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
John Locke and Jean Jacques Rousseau would be most likely to support a?
Dmitry [639]

Answer:   Locke and Rousseau would be most likely to support a <u>change of government brought about by the people</u>.

You might say this means they would support a <u>revolution</u> by the people against a bad government ... and to an extent that is true.   We might want to be cautious, however, in ascribing too much revolutionary fervor to either of those two philosophers.  Both of them were writing philosophy about how the people should be the sovereign power in a state -- that a government gets its power from the people and needs to serve the interests of the people.  So in theory, they support the people's right to remove a government that has become tyrannical and replace it with a government that works properly on behalf of the people.  But neither Locke nor Rousseau was personally advocating violent revolution.  American colonists took up arms against Britain in response to their sort of philosophy (especially Locke's).  And the bourgeoisie in France started the movement that became the French Revolution based on thoughts in both Lock and Rousseau.  But as Enlightenment thinkers, both men ideally hoped to convince others by means of their arguments that a constitutional form of government was the best idea (Locke), or even that direct democracy was the right way for a state to operate (Rousseau).

6 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • Who asked the pope to help defend his empire? -​
    13·1 answer
  • Why did the Founding Fathers include the Bill of Rights with the Constitution?
    8·2 answers
  • Can anyone answer this for me?
    15·1 answer
  • Which present day concern was most neglected during the renaissance period
    15·1 answer
  • What is the significance of the battle of lade?
    14·1 answer
  • How was prohibition openly ignored across many parts of America?
    6·1 answer
  • The first engagement between British troops and minutemen took place where?
    12·2 answers
  • Which of the following statements best describes Wilson's goals with his New Freedom plan?
    5·1 answer
  • What made it illegal to incite anti-war speech and propaganda during World War I?
    10·2 answers
  • When and where did Lewis and clark begin their journey
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!