Answer: A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss aversion will provide additional motivation
.
Options:
A. designating an anti-charity should be more effective because loss
aversion will provide additional motivation
B. designating a charity should be more effective because it avoids all potential for loss
C. it shouldn’t matter whether one designates a charity or anti-charity
D. self-interest biases generally keep people from choosing the anti-charity
Explanation:
The study of behavioral Economics shows that people are more driven by the loss of fear than the hope of gain. This is known as loss aversion. In commitment contracts where penalty money is promised to a charity or an anti-charity if the goal is not achieved, those who promise their money to an anti-charity tend to achieve their goals more. The same also applies when comparing this group and those who do not have to forego anything if they do not meet their target.
This is because giving to a charity will still seem beneficial while losing the money to an anti-charity will seem like a total loss.
Answer:
Size
Explanation:
High temperature and drying were both associated with greater per capita mortality rate Smaller population sizes at high temperatures and drying regimes may result from increased desiccation of adults and thus higher mortality.
Answer:
a mixed economy is an economic system combining private and public enterprise
Explanation:
An example of a mixed economy would be The U.S. and France.
Answer: B
Explanation: During the 1st part of the 1800's the North and the South grew in different ways. In the North, cities are where you can find wealth and manufacturing. There were a lot of skilled workers in the North. Meanwhile in the South, there was not much industrial manufacturing. There were very few skilled workers. Most of the people there were farmers and money came from planting crops like cotton, rice, sugar cane and tobacco. It was the slaves who did most of the work on the plantations.
However aside from that, the greatest significant difference leading up to the Civil war was:
“The North favored a protectionist tariff on foreign goods, while the South did not.”
