Answer:
a. $55,200
(Accounting cost = Explicit cost = Direct expenses = 15,000 + 3,000 + 1,000 + 1,200 + 35,000 = 55,200)
Here is the answer of the given question above. The decision rule that should be followed when deciding if a business segment should be eliminated is this: Segments with revenues which are less than avoidable expenses should be considered for elimination. <span>Unavoidable expense are those expense which will continue to be incurred whether segment is continued or discontinued. Hope this helps.</span>
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": to raise competition among firms in the cartel.
Explanation:
A cartel is a group of companies or countries working together to regulate the price of a single product they produce in common. The cartel makes it impossible for a foreign business to enter the market and demand lower prices. Cartels are, in most cases, not helpful to customers. They generate high prices that remain unchanged until consumers find alternative ways to purchase the same items.
Under such a scenario,<em> cartels are unlikely to be formed to generate more competition among the companies that compose them.</em>
Answer and Explanation:
The three possible reasons are as follows:
Variables done under survey:
1. The surgical equipment cost may be change in the case when there is various vendor
2. The type or the method might be different in the case when there is a gap of generation between these two doctors
3, The management may given the various targets via revenue as one could work less in order to compensate
Here the mean variable difference would be tested by two means for each and every case or conduct the ANOVA for 3 variables that delievers the study that should be main and descriptive
Answer:
Workplace discrimination prevents the firm from using the full potential of those employees that are being discriminated against.
Explanation:
For example, if the firm discriminates against a specific group of people when hiring (for example, it can discriminate against older people), the firm could lose valuable potential employees that could have provided great skill and experience for the firm.
If the firm practices discrimination against employees, the operation in the company will not be as streamlined as it could be against discrimination because those who are being treated poorly will be less motivated and have lesser output.