False. 
This is a periodic tenancy because Tom, as the tenant, may rent the apartment for successive periods under his lease, despite being "month-to-month." A tenancy at will, however, allows either the landlord or the tenant to terminate the arrangement at any time because there is more flexibility in the arrangement. 
One key difference is the issue of the tenant's notice to vacate the apartment. Under periodic tenancy, the law typically requires the tenant to give at least one period (here, one month) notice to the landlord of the tenant's wish to leave the property. No such notice requirement is typically found within a tenancy at will. 
        
             
        
        
        
Anne is conducting market research by doing a competitive analysis. 
Hope this helps! :)
        
             
        
        
        
Carolyn should contact them and offer her services on the job, furthermore she should set a meeting to discuss the specifics of the project.
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
The correct answer is A. A publisher prevents its employees from using office computers for personal use.
Explanation
Internal compliance is a set of strategic internal rules and measures focused on employee behavior and ethics. This internal Compliance was obtained with the aim of improving business practices aimed at raising the quality level of results, goals, and objectives. According to the above, the correct answer is "A. publisher prevents its employees from using office computers for personal use." because this is an example of a business rule that pre-empted the misuse of company equipment preventing its employees from using it for purposes other than corporate ones.
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer: False 
Explanation:
In both the first and second years, firms in country A undertook FDI projects of $20 billion in country B. This means that Country A had FDI outflows of $20 billion in those two years not inflows. Inflows are what happens when the FDI is coming into the country. 
Country B on the other hand, was receiving money from country A. Country B therefore had FDI inflows of $20 billion in each of the two years and not outflows like Country A had.