Question

According to stewart et al. (2013), response generalization is not a very good explanation for the generativity of language. Explain this point and provide their alternative approach

Answer 1

According to Stewart et al. (2013), there is no universally accepted definition of response generalization, and many definitions take into account physical resemblance across stimuli, which is not necessarily true of language's generativity. In general, it is more of an explanatory fiction and doesn't demonstrate the generativity of language. According to Stewart et al., derived relational response is a far wiser option.

The capacity for both producing and comprehending previously unspoken statements is referred to as language generativity. Response generalization is one process that is frequently mentioned as underpinning linguistic generativity. Due to generativity in language we can make infinite number of messages

Learn more about generativity of language here

brainly.com/question/20921887

#SPJ4