Answer:
- 'The law is "narrowly tailored" to achieve the compelling purpose, and uses the "least restrictive means" to achieve the purpose.'
Explanation:
As per 'strict scrutiny analysis,' in order to illustrate that a specific government action is constitutionally accurate, the government requires to demonstrate that the law is closely adapted in order to attain the compelling purpose by employing 'fewer conditional sources' that helps in attaining the desired purpose. Basically, the government needs to prove that the action is necessary to achieve the goal.
Answer: that is a democrat. have a good day btw :)
Yes, it prevents anything serious
<span>stare decisis means a basic principle of the law whereby once a decision (a precedent) on a certain set of facts has been made</span>
For the first question, the options are:
one’s feelings about oneself
environmental and fam<span>ily stresses
the behavior of friends
the behavior of admired celebrities
The key word in this question is "internal", it's looking for internal influence. This means:
</span>
one’s feelings about oneself
The second question has the options:
<span>a parent’s behavior
one’s past experiences
one’s social tendencies
one’s personality
Here you need an "external" influence: this would be the following option: </span>
<span>a parent’s behavior </span>
