The correct answer is that such practices <span>have both positive and negative effects and need to be exercised cautiously.
According to Woolfolk, labeling an </span><span>exceptional student as bright or gifted is something that needs to exercised cautiously. On the one hand, labeling a student as exceptional has positives such as: boosting the student's confidence, morale and self-esteem, and encouraging them and motivating them to keep up their brilliant performance. However, the downside of labeling a student as exceptional is that it might put tremendous pressure and stress on the student to perform well, please others and meet their parents' and teachers' high expectations. </span>
The correct answer is C. Latent. Hope this helps!
The answer of this question is Sherman Antitrust act
Answer:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause.
Explanation:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause. Regulation of foreign commerce is exclusively a federal power because of the need for the federal government to speak with one voice when regulating commercial relations with foreign governments. The existence of legitimate state interests underlying state legislation will not justify state regulation of foreign commerce. The state statute, in imposing requirements for a license costing $50 and for a clear marking of goods as being from a foreign country, clearly is an attempt by the state to restrict or even eliminate the flow of such goods in foreign commerce. Thus, the statute is unconstitutional.
Technology takes us away from reality
