1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Anit [1.1K]
1 year ago
12

Pitman Company is a small but growing manufacturer of telecommunications equipment. The company has no sales force of its own; r

ather, it relies completely on independent sales agents to market its products These agents are paid a commission of 15% of selling price for all items sold.Barbara Cheney, Pittman's controller, has just prepared the company's budgeted income statement for next year. The statement follows:As Barbara handed the statement to Karl Vecci, Pittman's president, she commented, "I went ahead and used the agents' 15% commission rate in completing these statements, but we've just learned that they refuse to handle our products next year unless we increase the commission rate to 20%.""That's the last straw," Karl replied angrily. "Those agents have been demanding more and more, and this time they've gone too far. How can they possibly defend a 20% commission rate?""They claim that after paying for advertising, travel, and the other costs of promotion, there's nothing left over for profit," replied Barbara."I say it's just plain robbery, retorted Karl. "And I also say it's time we dumped those guys and got our own sales force. Can you get your people to work up some cost figures for us to look at?""We've already worked them up." said Barbara. "Several companies we know about pay a 7.5% commission to their own salespeople, along with a small salary. Of course, we would have to handle all promotion costs, too. We figure our fixed costs would increase by 2,400,000 per year, but that would be more than offset by the 3,200,000(20% Ã 16,000,000) that we would avoid on agents' commissions."The breakdown of the 2,400,000 cost follows:"Super," replied Karl. "And I noticed that the 2,400,000 is just what we're paying the agents under the old 15 % commission rate.""It's even better than that," explained Barbara. "We can actually save 75,000 a year because that's what we're having to pay the auditing firm now to check out the agents" reports. So our overall administrative costs would be less.""Pull all of these numbers together and we'Il show them to the executive committee tomorrow," said Karl. "With the approval of the committee, we can move on the natter immediately"Required:Compute Pittman Company's break-even point in sales dollars for next year assuming:
(c) The company employs its own sales force.
Business
1 answer:
Vinvika [58]1 year ago
7 0

Degree of operating leverage=Contribution/EBIT

=7600,000/1015000=7.49

We would continue to use the sales agents for at least one more year, and possibly for two

more years. The reasons are as follows:

First, the use of sales agents would have a less dramatic effect on operating leverage net income.

Second, the use of the sales agents for at least one more year would give the company more time to hire competent people and get the sales group organized.

Third, the sales force plan doesn’t become more desirable than the use of sales agents until the company reaches sales of $18,600,000 a year. This level probably won’t be reached for at least one more year, and possibly two years.

Fourth, the sales force plan will be higher operating leverage since it will greatly increase fixed costs (and decrease variable costs). One or two years from now, when sales have reached the $18,600,000 level, the company can benefit greatly from this leverage. For the moment, profits will be greater and risks will be less by staying with the agents, even at the higher 20% commission rate.

Learn more about operating leverage at

brainly.com/question/24278932

#SPJ4

You might be interested in
Suppose the total market value of all the final goods and services produced in the country of Rushya was $8 billion in 2008 (mea
Advocard [28]

Answer:

Option 4 is definitely correct: Whether real GDP increased cannot be determined with the information given.

Explanation:

The information that is given only states that there has been an increase in the market value of final goods and services in two years. So, we cannot conclude that production increased in Rushya or average price levels increased there as per Option A and C respectively, because market value can be increased by both increase in production or price levels. Even Option B cannot be concluded as the real GDP is dependent on other variables as compared to the total market value.

Thus, only appropriate statement is option D: we cannot determine increase in real GDP with the given information.

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following is not true concerning the usage of public land. a. Public land is managed by federal and state agencies.
tekilochka [14]

Answer: The correct answer is "b. Unprotected lands exist inside federal parks.".

Explanation: The statement "Unprotected lands exist inside federal parks" is NOT TRUE concerning the usage of public land because there are no unprotected lands within federal parks.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following is a risk of investing in a privately held company, instead of a publicly held company?
kolezko [41]

Private companies are not controlled b y the government and therefore there is a risk of shutting down as well, but Public companies are government owned companies

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Blossom Company's accounting records show the following for the year ending on December 31, 2017.
LuckyWell [14K]

Answer:  $678,220

Explanation:

Given that,

Purchase Discounts = $ 11,000

Freight-in = $15,300

Purchases = $689,020

Beginning Inventory = $55,000

Ending Inventory = $45,600

Purchase Returns and Allowances = $15,100

Cost of goods purchased:

= Purchases + Freight in - Purchase discounts - Purchase returns and allowances

= $689,020  + $15,300  - $ 11,000  -  $15,100

= $678,220

4 0
3 years ago
What is income not used for consumption called?
inna [77]
The answer to the question above is letter C. The income that is not used for consumption is called a SAVINGS. Saving consist of the amount left over when the cost of a person's consumer expenditure is subtracted from the amount of disposable income he or she earns.
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • brian buys a case of 12 bottled waters for 4.99 and a 12 pack of oreos for 5.99 for his volleyball team. there are a total of 12
    10·1 answer
  • How many weeks does it take you to bring home $6000?​
    11·1 answer
  • As a person consumes more of a good or service, the person's _____ will increase. At the same time, this person's _____ will dec
    12·1 answer
  • Fiji, Inc. started 2025 with $12,000 in assets and $2,500 in liabilities. Fiji had issued 50 shares of stock when it went into b
    7·1 answer
  • A. treats financial indicators as the sole measurement of performance B. evaluates performance based on organizational participa
    9·1 answer
  • In un sistema economico l’offerta di lavoro da parte delle famiglie `e fissa e pari a Ls = 9. Nel sistema operano 100 imprese id
    8·1 answer
  • ₥Ɏ ₲Ø₳Ⱡ₴ ₳ⱤɆ ฿ɆⱧł₦Đ ɎØɄⱤ Ʉ₦ĐɆⱤ₴₮₳₦Đł₦₲.
    6·1 answer
  • Provo, Inc., had revenues of $10 million, cash operating expenses of $5 million, and depreciation and amortization of $1 million
    11·1 answer
  • Producer c has written 25 policies over the last 12 months, 4 of which have been issued to his employees in a side business, acc
    11·1 answer
  • Bert just purchased his first property. to what level(s) of government will bert have to pay real estate taxes?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!