Answer:
The amount Laramie should record the purchase of land is <u>$6.2 million</u>.
Explanation:
The costs of a fixed asset refer to the purchase price and other relevant costs which are incurred in order to the location and working condition required to operate the fixed asset in way that it is intended.
The other relevant costs that are added to the purchase price to arrive at the cost of the fixed assets include professional fees, non-refundable taxes or levies, and among others.
If any trade discount or rebate is given, this will be deducted from the purchase price to arrive at the cost.
Any interest required to be paid on the delayed payment in order to reflects the time value of money are not part of the cost of the asset but expensed in the year they are incurred.
From the question, the land acquired is a fixed asset. Based on the explanation above, the total cost of the asset is $6.2 million. The interest from the 6% interest rate on the remaining $5 million will be part of the cost of the land but it will be expensed in the year they are incurred.
Therefore, the amount Laramie should record the purchase of land is <u>$6.2 million</u>.
Answer:
A) The GAAP statement is based on cost function rather than cost behavior.
Explanation:
Income statements that follow GAAP rules categorizes expenses based on their business function: product, selling or administrative.
While cost behavior categorizes costs based on how they influence a company's activities: variable, fixed and mixed. When a manager wants to measure the impact of any decision he/she makes, they need to use this type of categorization. For example, if fixed costs increase, what is the new break even point? If variable costs decrease, how is the marginal cost affected?
I think its B if not B than C most likely
Answer: When a government purchase increases during a war, be it a local war or a world war. it means that it's savings has reduced, therefore the trade balance will fall. And if the purchase is done to import more goods into the country, the trade balance becomes negative, leading to a deficit.
The exchange rate of the currency will reduce because the country the government is making more currency to be available and surplus, by increasing it's purchase. When they is excess currency in the world market, the currency reduces it value. In a world war, or local war, the exchange rate may not actually reduce because, it will be difficult for the country to have enough money to make its currency to be available in the world market.
When it first gets wet then later down the way u wish then let it dry
