Answer:
b. Restrict first amendment rights.
Explanation:
The Schenck v. United States (1919) Supreme Court case ruled by putting limitations on the rights of individuals if it concerns the interest of the nation. This ruling states that constitutional rights are not absolute and can be changed anytime the government sees fit.
The Supreme Court decided to issue the limits on the freedoms of individuals, especially during wartime. This ruling established the ability of the government in suppressing any speech or news that it thinks is harmful to the welfare of the nation. It stated that with concerns regarding the <em>"clear and present danger" </em>that can put the nation in jeopardy, the government is free to restrict the first amendment rights as and when it feels necessary.
Thus, the correct answer is option b.
Answer:
Explanation:
It means that a person represents the state he comes from. He always tries to get what is best for his state and his district. For example, someone from San Francisco would vote for different things than perhaps someone from Los Angeles.
The president Abraham Lincoln
Answer:
mark me as the brainliest plss
west Germany was under control of America and England after the war and east Germany was under control of Russia. Many people in east Germany disagreed with communist Russia's system and they left to go to West Germany. Russia put up a wall, later named the Berlin Wall, to prevent this. it was heavily guarded and many people died attempting to escape.
