Answer:
Option A
Please mark me as BRAINLEST
Well, two answers are very close and in a way both correct:
Having the freedom to do whatever someone wants
<span>Having the freedom to make decisions that align with one s desires, goals, and social context
I would say the second one is better- one is rarely really free to do everything, as one is limited by resources etc, but autonomy would still mean being able to </span><span><span>make decisions that align with one s desires, goals, and social context.</span> </span>
Basing the results on facts is what that Jessica and junior scientists need to do consider when conducting studies and experiments. Making results on the basis of facts is gives more accurate and factual information. Performing experiments while studying is the best possible way to acquire information or knowledge.
The information or any detail can be stated as accurate and correct when it is based on the facts because this kind of result/ information is free from errors and biased results.
Based on the socio-psychological analysis, in older adults, a higher level of social support is related to "<u>reduction in symptoms of the disease."</u>
<h3>What is Social Support?</h3>
Social support is generally a sociological term that describes having support such as friends and families during need.
Social Support is considered to improve the qualify of life for individuals.
Therefore, research has shown that in older adults, a higher level of social support reduces symptoms of the disease.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is "<u>reduction in symptoms of the disease."</u>
Learn more about Social Support here: brainly.com/question/7463943
It depends the goal of the argumentative paper. If you are arguing for a clear purpose use the expert testimony because of its credibility. Although if you are arguing and spitballing around about a topic then use your opinion about it.
<span />