eaw ewewae wes ds sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss eeeeeeeeeeeeee
The three sensory words from the passage are: <em>dry, deserted, and damp.</em> Sensory words describe how we perceive the world, they are related to how we see, feel, smell, hear or taste things, so any word that describe how we sense the world is considered a sensory word. The word dry describes how we perceive the lack of humidity, maybe with our bare feet, the word deserted is almost a synonym for dry in this context, and the last sensory word is dam, which is an antonym for dry and deserted because it expresses the excess of humidity.
Answer:
I think it's chronological
Explanation:
please let me know if im right
It sounds like Fredrick Douglass was pointing out that slave masters didn't want their slaves to have knowledge such as reading and writing, let alone knowing their own ages and such.
Most slave masters wanted this so that they could feel superior over blacks, and they didn't want the slaves to be equal with them.
I believe the correct answers are:
- an Indo-European language of Germanic origin: this is definitely true as old English (as well as modern English) belongs to the Germanic group of languages, along with Scandinavian languages (Swedish, Norwegian, Danish, Icelandic), German, Yiddish, etc. And all of them are Indo-European languages
- depended on inflections to indicate gender: this statement is also true. Old English, also known as Anglo-Saxon English, used different suffixes to denote the gender of a noun. So if a noun was female, it would have a different suffix from that of male/neuter gender. This has mostly disappeared from modern English.
- depended on inflections to indicate grammatical form: this statement is also true. Old English used different suffixes to denote the form of a word, such as the tense, or possessive form, etc. This is something that modern English has kept as well, and you can see it in -ed suffix for past tense, or 's used for possessive form.
These three options are definitely correct, whereas 'similar to modern English' is definitely incorrect because they almost look nothing alike. I'm not sure about the mixture of many languages though - it had many dialects, but ultimately it was one Germanic/Viking language, so I don't think other languages influenced it a lot at the time - that came later with Middle English.
