Explanation:
Charter colonies were governed by joint stock companies, which received charters from the king and enjoyed quite a bit of self-government. ... Royal colonies were controlled by the king through his representative, the royal governor
Pls Mark As BrainLiest
The correct answer is controlled
Explanation: Unlike many recent interpretations of Beethoven’s piano sonatas, the recitalist’s performance was a delightfully free and introspective one; nevertheless, it was also, seemingly paradoxically, quite <u>controlled.</u>
<u>The answer is "Authoritarian Government".</u>
Authoritarianism, guideline of visually impaired accommodation to authority, instead of individual opportunity of thought and activity. In government, authoritarianism indicates any political framework that amasses control in the hands of a pioneer or a little tip top that isn't naturally mindful to the body of the general population. Authoritarian leaders regularly practice control power arbitrarily and without respect to existing groups of law, and they as a rule can't be supplanted by natives picking uninhibitedly among different competitors in elections.
According to Karl Marx, social change results from the efforts of <span>the powerless to gain power. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the first option or option "a". I hope that this is the answer that you were looking for and it has actually come to your help.</span>
Social Darwinism was most likely applied to treat immigrants from different regions differently, however, Social Darwinism does not specifically relate to immigrants but also to all members of society. In the American context, the notion was implemented to popularize the notion of "survival of the fittest" or that the strongest members of a society will succeed and the political system should support this theory.
