The most common justification of police officer corruption exists in the rotten-apple statement that the officer alone stands as deviant.
<h3>What are the responses about police misconduct?</h3>
The most common justification of police officer corruption exists in the rotten-apple statement that the officer alone stands as deviant. This argument extends to rotten bushels-groups of officials banding together to commit deviant actions.
Most often when we listen about police misconduct, it's due to instances of extreme use of force, brutality, lawlessness, coercive interrogations, witness tampering, or racial profiling. These actions can result in physical harm or death, wrongful imprisonment, and infringement of constitutional rights.
Incidents of unethical or criminal misconduct can influence the officer's capability to testify in both criminal and civil trials. In addition, such incidents may result in direct civil liability for the agency and may impact the agency's capability to protect itself in other, irrelevant civil trials.
To learn more about police misconduct refer to:
brainly.com/question/15022635
#SPJ9
