All categories

2 years ago

Expressway lane markings are of a different design and meaning as on other roadways. a) true b) false

Business

1 answer:

Pavlova-9 [17]2 years ago

5 0

The design and purpose of expressway lane markings differ from those on other roads. The given statement is True.

What is an Express lane?

Express Lanes are unused paths built in expansion to any existing general-purpose paths to supply drivers the choice of a more solid trip by paying a toll.
Toll costs are set to oversee traffic and have fair the proper number of vehicles within the path to supply dependable, shorter travel time.
On a few Express Lanes, tolls can change in cost depending on the level of blockage.
As activity increments, the toll cost goes up to create sure the path continuously remains a free-flowing elective for travelers.
Then again, the toll cost will diminish when there's less activity within the path.
Drivers will continuously be charged the sum on the overhead signage when they enter the Express Lane.

To know more about express lane markings visit:

brainly.com/question/27840312

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

A travel agency discovers that it has been charged for payments to a print shop drawn on checks written by an unknown third part

trasher [3.6K]

Answer:

Forgery or Alteration Coverage Form.

Explanation:

The travel agency loss would be covered under Forgery or Alteration coverage form.

Under Commercial Crime insuring agreement, It insures an individual or business against the forgery or alteration of financial instruments e.g promissory notes, drafts, and checks with respect to payment of a sum of money that was made or drawn by the insured or anyone acting on his/her behalf such as next of kin.

8 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers

$6000 is invested into 2 accounts at 8% and 7.5% and the total interest is $472.50 how much is invested at 8%?

djverab [1.8K]

0.08x+0.057 (6000-x)=472.5
Solve for x
X=4500 invested at 8%

4 0

2 years ago

Borghia Pharmaceuticals has $1 million allocated for capital expenditures. a. Which of the following projects should the company

balu736 [363]

Answer:

Please refer below the answer in detail

Explanation:

With a limited budget, the firm will first pursue projects with the highest return, and the allocate the remaining capital to the project with the second highest return, and so on until all capital is fully allocated. Based on the information, Project 6 has the highest return, followed by 1 and 3. These three projects together will cost:

350,000 + 300,000 + 250,000 = $900,000

After those three projects, the firm will have $100,000 left. The best out of remaining project is 7, but it costs 400,000, which the firm cannot afford. The best affordable project is 4, which offers a return of 12.1%. Hence, the firm should spend the remaining 100,000 on project 4.

The budget limit constraints the firm to give up project 7, which offers a NPV of $48,000. The firm is forced to choose project 4, which has a NPV of $14,000.

Thus the lost in market value of the firm = 48,000 - 14,000 = $34,000.

4 0

2 years ago

Assume that locating a cement factory in the middle of Boston would save the producer $5 million at a public expense, in polluti

never [62]

Answer:

$5 million

Explanation:

If we follow the Coase Theorem, the appropriate solution to this case should be obtained regardless of initial rights. In this case, the factory saves $5 million to the producer, but it costs $10 million to Boston residents. if Boston residents pay $5 million or more to the factory owner, then both would benefit. Boston residents will gain $10 - $5 = $5 million, as well as the factory owner.

7 0

2 years ago

Exxon's response to the 1989 Valdez tanker oil spill in Alaska is an excellent example of a company using thoughtful crisis mana

PilotLPTM [1.2K]

Answer:

Exxon's response worsened its public standing.

Explanation:

Crisis management is the application of game plan to help an organization deal with a sudden and significant negative event.

The Exxon's response is a perfect example of how company should apply thoughtful response in crisis management because Exxon corporation failed to follow several well-established procedures thereby damaged its public standing, failed to seize control of developments after the spill and sending lower-ranking executive to address the situation instead of the chairman going there himself to take control of the situation in a possible way.

The action taken by Exxon led to the impression that the company disregard pollution problem by not involving top management.

6 0

3 years ago