Answer:
Operating cash flow= $29,886
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
Sales= $262,100
Total variable cost= $144,000
Total fixed costs= $61,300.
Annual interest expense of $24,500. The annual depreciation is $25,200 and the tax rate is 34 percent.
<u>We need to determine the operating cash flow:</u>
Sales= 262,100
Total variable cost= (144,000)
Contribution margin= 118,100
Total fixed costs= (61,300)
Depreciation= (25,200)
Interest= (24,500)
EBIT= 7,100
Tax= (7,100*0.34)= (2,414)
Depreciation= 25,200
Operating cash flow= 29,886
Answer:
a. Incremental analysis.
b. Sunk cost.
c. Relevant information.
d. Opportunity cost.
e. Joint products.
f. Out-of-pocket cost.
g. Split-off point.
Explanation:
a. Incremental analysis: examination of differences between costs to be incurred and revenue to be earned under different courses of action.
b. Sunk cost: a cost incurred in the past that cannot be changed as a result of future actions. Sunk cost can be defined as a cost or an amount of money that has been spent on something in the past and as such cannot be recovered.
c. Relevant information: costs and revenue that are expected to vary, depending on the course of action decided on. Hence, relevant cost are relevant for decision-making purposes but not sunk costs.
d. Opportunity cost: the benefit foregone by not pursuing an alternative course of action. Opportunity cost also known as the alternative forgone, can be defined as the value, profit or benefits given up by an individual or organization in order to choose or acquire something deemed significant at the time.
e. Joint products: products made from common raw materials and shared production processes.
f. Out-of-pocket cost: a cost yet to be incurred that will require future payment and may vary among alternative courses of action.
g. Split-off point: the point at which manufacturing costs are split equally between ending inventory and cost of goods sold. Thus, it give rise to joint products that emerge from the same raw materials and a shared manufacturing process.
This participative style of leadership suggests that Gary is a <u>"democratic" </u>leader.
Democratic leadership, otherwise called participative leadership or shared leadership, is a sort of leadership style in which individuals from the gathering play a more participative job in the basic leadership process. This sort of administration can apply to any association, from private organizations to schools to government.
Everybody is given the chance to take part, thoughts are traded unreservedly, and talk is energized. While the majority rule process tends to center around gathering equity and the free stream of thoughts, the pioneer of the gathering is still there to offer direction and control. The democratic leader is accused of choosing who is in the gathering and who gets the opportunity to add to the choices that are made.
Answer:
$67,000
Explanation:
Miller$72,000/60%=$ 120,000 loss to eliminate capital
Tyson$72,000/20%=$ 360,000 loss to eliminate capital
Watson$19,000/20%=$ 95,000 loss to eliminate capital
Watson is the partner most vulnerable to a loss of $95,000 which will inturn eliminate Watson's capital balance
Hence:
$162,000-$95,000
=$67,000
Therefore if the loss on disposal is less than $95,000, all partners will retain positive capital balances and receive some cash in liquidation reason been that other assets which is $162,000, must be sold for any amount over $67,000 for all partners to get cash.
Answer:
Suburban organizational structures of homes are of different patterns that is evolving over the years.
From the days of cluster pattern of building of homes. This was struck out because it does not allow cross ventilation.
The elongated building system by the side of roads. The danger of over closeness to road struck out this organizational structure of suburban homes.
Also,Suburban structures occasionally call to mind their roots in the frontier experience — a pioneering spirit crystallized in the image of a small house standing at the edge of a vast and savage landscape. Confronting the wilderness, this cabin provides a place of refuge for the men and women who work the land in advance of the settlement yet to come. Today the legacy of the pioneer’s cabin can be encountered at the fringes of suburbia like a portent of the vast expanses of housing that will follow in its wake. In true pioneering fashion, the structure shown here lays claim to the landscape simply by virtue of being there first. The homespun elements of pitched roof and white timber siding, fetishistically pristine against the churned soil of the building site, are the formal embodiment of the myth of Manifest Destiny — a symbol of enterprise, resourcefulness and ultimate triumph in the face of an unknown and threatening world. Like Abbe Laugier’s own primitive hut, both natural and affected, this cabin stands as the proud primogenitor of suburbia.
