1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ASHA 777 [7]
1 year ago
6

Is it possible to balance individual rights and personal freedoms with social control and respect for legitimate authority? Why

or why not?
Law
2 answers:
8090 [49]1 year ago
6 0

A balance between individual rights and social control is possible through a set of democratic and participatory laws.

<h3>What are individual rights?</h3>

Individual rights is a term that refers to the freedoms and rights that an individual has from the moment he is born. Among these rights are the right to move freely, the right to think and express oneself freely, among others.

<h3>What is control and authority?</h3>

Control and authority are terms that refer to the control that the state has over individuals so that society is in harmony and the lives of citizens are not disturbed.

In accordance with the above, it can be inferred that it is possible that there is a balance between these two concepts. In fact, in most democratic states today, individual rights allow the control and legitimate authority of the state.

Learn more about individual rights in: brainly.com/question/619133

#SPJ1

Alex787 [66]1 year ago
5 0

Answer:

Explanation:

Yes, I do believe that it is possible to balance individual rights and personal freedoms with social control and respect for legitimate authority because: Individual rights are the rights that are guaranteed to all American Citizens from the U.S. Constitution, especially the Bill of Rights.

You might be interested in
The Supreme Court allowed United Parcel Service employees to open packages without a warrant to inspect contents of the package
Vitek1552 [10]

Answer:

c. Federal Express v. UPS

Explanation:

i think

8 0
2 years ago
Challenges of separation of power
Scrat [10]
In several Supreme Court decisions this decade, the question of whether a constitutional attack on a statute should be considered “as applied” to the actual facts of the case before the Court or “on the face” of the statute has been a difficult preliminary issue for the Court. The issue has prompted abundant academic discussion. Recently, scholars have noted a preference within the Roberts Court for as-applied constitutional challenges. However, the cases cited as evidence for the Roberts Court’s preference for as-applied challenges all involve constitutional challenges which concede the legislative power to enact the provision but nevertheless argue for unconstitutionality because the statute intrudes upon rights or liberties protected by the Constitution. Of course, this is not the only type of constitutional challenge to a statute; some constitutional challenges attack the underlying power of the legislative branch to pass the statute in question. Modern scholarship, however, as well as the Supreme Court, has mostly ignored the difference between these two different types of constitutional challenges to statutes when discussing facial and as-applied constitutional challenges. In glossing over this difference, considerations which fundamentally affect whether a facial or as-applied challenge is appropriate have gone unnoticed. By clearly distinguishing between these two very different types of constitutional challenges, and the respective role of a federal court in adjudicating each of these challenges, a new perspective can be gained on the exceedingly difficult question of when a facial or as-applied challenge to a statute is appropriate. In this Article, I argue that federal courts are constitutionally compelled to consider the constitutionality of a statute on its face when the power of Congress to pass the law has been challenged. Under the separation of powers principles enunciated in I.N.S. v. Chadha and Clinton v. New York, federal courts are not free to ignore the “finely wrought” procedures described in the Constitution for the creation of federal law by “picking and choosing” constitutional applications from unconstitutional applications of the federal statute, at least when the statute has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s enumerated powers in the Constitution. The separation of powers principles of I.N.S. and Clinton, which preclude a “legislative veto” or an executive “line item veto,” should similarly preclude a “judicial application veto” of a law that has been challenged as exceeding Congress’s Constitutional authority.
6 0
3 years ago
True or false?
Advocard [28]

Answer:

True.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Which of the roles in the court system that we discussed would you want as a career.
SpyIntel [72]

Answer: COURT REPOTER, Court reporters, also known as guardians of the record because of their impartiality and role within the judicial process, capture the words spoken by everyone during a court or deposition proceeding. Court reporters then prepare verbatim transcripts of proceedings.

Explanation: i am not sure what you and your teacher where talking about but here's a answer

8 0
3 years ago
Why do hate crimes go unreported
tino4ka555 [31]
Every crime may have a chance to either go reported unreported.
Reason being is most crimes are private and everything discussed about a crime stays in the court room.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • The remnant of an estate that has been conveyedto take effect and be enjoyed after the terminationof a prior estate, as when an
    7·2 answers
  • What is democracy according to Abraham lincoln​
    8·1 answer
  • Which branch? Use the letters from above to match each job with the branch of government.
    9·1 answer
  • Do arresting officers ever obtain incriminating statements from suspects ?
    9·1 answer
  • The principle that the rules of a legal system apply equally to all persons, institutions, and entities—public or private—that m
    15·1 answer
  • What is a mandate?
    13·1 answer
  • 22. Some statistics show that a boy who watches his father hit his mother is more likely to hit his own spc
    9·1 answer
  • Which of the following would be considered a reasonable accommodation for
    7·1 answer
  • Take some time to explore the constitutionally protected rights in the United States and how they compare to the rights that are
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is NOT true about a joint and survivor annuity benefit option?
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!