Answer:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause.
Explanation:The Statute is an unconstitutional violation of the Commerce Clause. Regulation of foreign commerce is exclusively a federal power because of the need for the federal government to speak with one voice when regulating commercial relations with foreign governments. The existence of legitimate state interests underlying state legislation will not justify state regulation of foreign commerce. The state statute, in imposing requirements for a license costing $50 and for a clear marking of goods as being from a foreign country, clearly is an attempt by the state to restrict or even eliminate the flow of such goods in foreign commerce. Thus, the statute is unconstitutional.
<h2>Answer^_^</h2>
<h2>Sher Bhadur Deuba </h2>
<h2>Mark me as brainliest ❤️</h2>
I believe the answer is Bactericidal.
Bactericidal refers to the type of substance that kills bacteria. (penicillin is effective to kill <span> staphylococci, streptococci, and meningococci)</span>
Because of this characteristic, natural penicillin <span>is widely used</span> in clinical practices as antibiotics.
The idea of equality for all men was central to the philosophy of the European Enlightenment. But ever since the Declaration of Independence was written, debate has surrounded how to interpret the phrase "all mankind."
Others contend that Jefferson and the other authors of the Declaration intended to exclude women and children, despite the fact that the majority of people have taken "all men" to imply humanity.
In the context of the time, it is evident that "all men" was a euphemism for "humanity," and as a result, those who used the Declaration of Independence to demand equality for African Americans and women—people like Elizabeth Cady Stanton, Abraham Lincoln, and Martin Luther King—seized both the historical and moral high ground.
To learn more about All men were created equal here
brainly.com/question/7540675
#SPJ4
