Answer:While it was true that the cotton gin reduced the labor of removing seeds, it did not reduce the need for slaves to grow and pick the cotton. ... Cotton growing became so profitable for the planters that it greatly increased their demand for both land and slave labor.Sep 23, 2016The conductor of the Underground Railroad could be the person who helps the slave escape, the lines could refer to the road or the passage which the slaves escaped from one safe house to another, the station could refer to the stops they make in the safe houses, and the freight may refer to the slaves that are escaping ...
2 answers
All of these men involved themselves in the abolitionist movement by speaking out. They all were against slavery and one in particular, Frederic Douglas, wrote many books after being freed from slavery. He was also invited to go on tour and make speeches about antislavery.
·
Top answer:
The Underground Railroad is not a railroad that is underground
Explanation:
Answer:
The palace of Versailles was a symbol to the people of wealth and how much power Louis XIV had in Europe. The practical purpose that Louis XIV had when it came to making the palace was just to show off to the people and show how much control he had over the economy and what he could do with the money.
Explanation:
Answer:
American neutrality
The president insisted that all government actions be neutral, and that the belligerents must respect that neutrality according to the norms of international law.
The Americans helped the British Empire, French and Portuguese forces defeat and turn back the powerful final German offensive, also the Americans played a role in the Allied final offensive
Hope this helps!!
The third one down would be right
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
During the times of NAFTA, the North America Free Trade Agreement between México, Canada, and the United States, many people opposed the treaty and questioned President Bill Clinton about it.
Nader and Buchanan opposed the ratification of NAFTA. This influenced what Clinton said in his speech of September 14, 1993. On that day, President Clinton signed two supplements that were included in the Free Trade Agreement.
President Clinton’s speech addressed the arguments against NAFTA that Nader and Buchanan made in that hehe said it was not true that the trade meant just moving out jobs from the US to México. And he clearly explained that Mexicans with lower income than Germans or Europeans spent more in US products, more than those Europeans and Canadians.
