chill, hope you make good friends
Answer:
The answer is 16 years.
Explanation:
The formula for calculating the value of an investment that is compounded annually is given by:
Where:
is the number of years the investment is compounded,
is the annual interest rate,
is the principal investment.
We know the following:
And we want to clear the value <em>n</em> from the equation.
The problem can be resolved as follows.
<u>First step:</u> divide each member of the equation by 
:
<u>Second step:</u> apply logarithms to both members of the equation:
<u>Third step:</u> apply the logarithmic property 
in the second member of the equation:
Fourth step: divide both members of the equation by 
We can round up the number and conclude that it will take 16 years for $10,000 invested today in bonds that pay 6% interest compounded annually, to grow to $25,000.
Answer:
Letter A is correct. <u>Organizational objectives.</u>
Explanation:
A human resources manager is responsible for meeting a company's staffing needs and activities, such as the recruitment and selection process, training and development, development of policies and procedures, performance management, salaries and benefits.
For this, it is necessary to consider organizational objectives as a basis for assisting in the process of developing the function. An effective human resources manager, must base all his decisions prioritizing the strategic plan of obtaining objectives and goals of a company, ensuring that there is the correct allocation of resources and trained and motivated personnel to increase business productivity and generate a climate positive organizational structure in order to achieve organizational goals.
Answer: d. Decision-making lag
Explanation:
When policy makers have identified that there is a problem that needs fixing but cannot seem to agree on the way forward, this is known as a <em>Decision - Making Lag or simply the Decision Lag.</em> It is one of the 3 specific inside Policy Lags and can be devastating due to the uncertainty of time it might take.
For instance, the economists suggesting dropping the federal funds rate by 0.25% might have the backing of one half of the Fed and the other Economists, the other half. Arguments could therefore go on for weeks before a decision is made.
