Answer:
No
Explanation:
Loking at you past answers and one question, I noticed incoreect punctuation and incorrect lowercases.
Answer:
Prosecutors of this case can use the net worth method to determine the extent these executives have been receiving illegal incomes by computing their wealth at the beginning and at the end of the period under investigation.
There will be an increase in the executives wealth, and since this increase cannot be traced to any legal income source, it will become taxable income, with the calculated penalties and fines.
Explanation:
The net worth method specifies that any increase in wealth, which is not traced to non-taxable sources, should be determined as a taxable income for the period under review. Ordinarily, the net worth is the difference between assets and liabilities. Since the executives use the money personally at their convenience, this will increase their personal wealth.
<span>A nominal interest rate means very low interest rates therefore we can use money for long duration by paying very low interest rate. We can hold this money for land duration. We also invest this money in other investment plan that gives better returns. This nominal interest rate is very helpful for running any business.</span>
Answer:
Answer: The basis for the government's challenge to P&G's acquisition of Clorox
Explanation:
The horizontal merger is the basis for the government's challenge to P&G's acquisition of Clorox because the result would have lessened competition substantially in that line of commerce nationwide. P&G being the leading and mainly national advertiser and also mainly national seller of soaps, detergents and cleaners with sales that accounted for 54 % of the market and a leading brand with 48% of national sales.
With this type of advertising and power control which P&G possess, this would put P&G in a position to control the market and potentially detrimentally affect the consumers. These advantages they posses would reduce the number of competitors and lead to greater concentration in the industry they are.
This situation represents <u>progressive</u> type of tax system.
<u>Explanation</u>:
A progressive tax is laid on the people based on their ability to pay. A lower tax rate is charged for the individual with low income compared to the person with higher income. The tax rate is fixed based on the income of the person. The high income earners are charged tax with higher percentage.
In the above scenario, the income of Olaf is $100,000. So he pays $20,000 as tax. George earns $200,000, so he pays $48,000 as tax. George pays tax higher than Olaf, as he earns higher than Olaf.