Answer:
A) $49
Step-by-step explanation:
There are two ways to solve this problem. You could either calculate the net change by adding up the values in the table and then adding that to the initial amount, or you could individually add every change in price to the initial amount. I'm going to go with the first way, as I find it to be quicker, but both methods work equally well.
We know that the stock was worth $52 on Monday morning. From the table, the net (or overall) change in the stock over the course of the week is:
-2 + 1 + 3 - 1 - 4 = -3
Therefore, the stock's price decreased by $3 over the week, and because the stock's original price was $52, we know it is now worth 52 - 3 = $49. Hope this helps!
33% of decrease.
150-100=50
50 is 1/3 of 150
1/3= 33%
Answer:
Choice B) No.
Step-by-step explanation:
When she starts , she does a sit-up every 222 seconds.
But as she gets tired, each sit-up takes longer and longer to do.
It means, each sit-up takes more time than she did at beginning.
So, it is NOT proportional to the time.
If it is proportional, she should take constant number of sit-ups even she get tired.
Answer:
I'm pretty sure it's +(-6).
Step-by-step explanation:
Basically for these, you find the slope. The slope equation is y1-y2/x1-x2.
Pick two points.
I'll just do (1,15) and (2,9).
15-9/1-2 = 6/-1 = -6.
I don't know if you were taught it this way, but my math teacher always told us that the rate of change had to be positive.
So you'd say the rate of change is +(-6), not -6.
Hope that sorta helped lol
