All categories

2 years ago

One of the things that makes a triceratops unique when comparing it to other ceratopsidae is that it's frill?

Business

1 answer:

alexgriva [62]2 years ago

4 0

Lacks fenestrae makes a triceratops unique when comparing it to other Ceratopsidae.

Triceratops is characterized via a quick frill with a flat squamosal, an upturned caudal margin of the frill, the absence of fenestrae, and a midline epiparietal. Torosaurus is characterized by using an elongate frill with a straighter facet, a concave squamosal, and a shortage of upturning of the frill.

A year-long study by Yale university paleontologists concludes that two associated horned dinosaurs are different animals and not adult and juvenile versions of the same.

Now Scannella and Horner say that triceratops is simply the juvenile form of torosaurus. As the animal elderly, its horns changed shape and orientation and its frill became longer, thinner and less jagged. Eventually, it became fenestrated, producing the traditional torosaurus form.

Learn more about Triceratops here: brainly.com/question/24373044

#SPJ4

You might be interested in

Random Co. purchased a machine for $400,000 that has a five year life and will produce annual net cash inflows of $110,000 per y

inysia [295]

Answer:

NPV = $39,230

Payback period = 3.64 years

Explanation:

The net present value (NPV) = (net annual cash flow x interest factor) - investment

NPV = ($110,000 x 3.993) - $400,000 = $439,230 - $400,000 = $39,230

The payback period = investment / net annual cash flow = $400,000 / $110,000 = 3.64 years or 3 years, 7 months and 19 days

You can also calculate the PV of each annual cash flow which will give you a more precise result, but the variation is minimal:

PV = ($110,000 / 1.08) + ($110,000 / 1.08²) + ($110,000 / 1.08³) + ($110,000 / 1.08⁴) + ($110,000 / 1.08⁵) = $439,198

and the NPV = $39,198

5 0

3 years ago

What is a benefit of applying artificial intelligence to accenture work

Leviafan [203]

Answer:

A benefit of applying artificial intelligence to accenture work would be humans and machines.

Explanation:

Why?, well because by using AI, people will have to spend more time on exceptional work: 20% of non-routine tasks that drive 80% of value creation.

8 0

3 years ago

High Mountain Lumber (HML) has normal budgeted overhead costs of $115,150 and a normal capacity of 35,000 direct labor hours for

Furkat [3]

Answer:

Standard total overhead cost (0.5 hr x 25,000 x $3.29) 41,125

Less: Actual total overhead cost ($21,000 + $18,000) 39,000

Total overhead variance 2,125(F)

Standard overhead application rate

= <u>Budgeted overhead</u>

Budgeted direct labour hours

= <u>$115,150</u>

35,000 hours

= $3.29 per direct labour hour

Explanation:

Total overhead variance is the difference between standard total overhead cost and actual total overhead cost. Standard total overhead cost is the product of standard hours per unit, standard overhead application rate and actual output produced. Actual total overhead cost is the aggregate of actual variable overhead cost and actual fixed overhead cost. Standard overhead application rate is the ratio of budgeted overhead to budgeted direct labour hours (normal capacity).

6 0

3 years ago

Current Attempt in Progress Incorrect answer icon Your answer is incorrect. Carla Willis will invest $34,700 today. She needs $1

Nitella [24]

Answer:

12.18%

Explanation:

Present value = $34,700

Future Value = $173,500

Time (n) = 14 years

Interest Rate = i

Future Value = Present Value * (1+i)^n

$173,500 = $34,700 * (1 + i)^14

(1 + i)^14 = $173,500/$34,700

(1 + i)^14 = 5

1 + i = 5^(1/14)

1 + i = 1.1218284

i = 1.1218284 - 1

i = 0.1218284

i = 12.18%

So, the annual interest rate she must earn is 12.18%.

4 0

3 years ago

Great Lakes Packing has two bond issues outstanding. The first issue has a coupon rate of 3.50 percent, a par value of $1,000 pe

katrin [286]

Answer:

2.9652%

Explanation:

to determine the cost of debt we must use the FMV of the bonds plus the YTM:

first bond:

FMV = 1.09 x $1,000 = $1,090 x 3,600 bonds = $3,924,000

YTM = {C + [(F - P)/n]} / [(F + P)/2] = {17.5 + [(1000 - 1090)/16]} / [(1000 + 1090)/2] = (17.5 - 5.625) / 1045 = 1.136% x 2 = 2.27% annual

second bond:

FMV = 0.95 x $2,000 = $1,900 x 3,950 bonds = $7,505,000

YTM = {C + [(F - P)/n]} / [(F + P)/2] = {59.4 + [(2000 - 1900)/42]} / [(2000 + 1900)/2] = (59.4 + 2.38) / 1950 = 3.168% x 2 = 6.34% annual

total debt = $3,924,000 + $7,505,000 = $11,429,000

weighted average after tax cost of debt:

{($3,924,000/$11,429,000 x 2.27%) + ($7,505,000/$11,429,000 x 6.34%)} x (1 - 0.40) = (0.779% + 4.163%) x 0.6 = 4.942% x 0.6 = 2.9652%

6 0

4 years ago