Whenever de Posada says, "we're eating more marshmallows than we're generating," he is implying that there is more futility than usefulness taking place, seeing as how eating the marshmallow is futile, and vice versa.
Additionally, if we consume more marshmallows than we produce, then we can confidently say that we have achieved failure rather than success
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is success?</h3>
Generally, The state or circumstance of satisfying a certain set of expectations is referred to as successful. It is possible to see it as the polar opposite of failing.
Context determines the criteria for success, which may be related to a specific observer or set of beliefs. The criteria for success rely on context.
In conclusion, When de Posada makes the statement that "we're eating more marshmallows than we're creating," he is insinuating that there is more pointlessness than there is usefulness going place.
This is because eating the marshmallow is pointless, and the generation of marshmallows is also pointless.
In addition, if we go through more marshmallows than we make, we can certainly declare that our endeavor was a failure rather than a success. This is because consumption exceeds production.
Read more about success
brainly.com/question/28245765
#SPJ1
