The transition to this new helpful worldwide economy really started coming to fruition back in the 1950s—a period in which the machines that drove the Industrial Age changed apparatuses for the new Information Age.
The real move to a data based economy accentuated data dispersion and recovery and in addition transnational monetary collaboration. As a feature of this pattern, in the 1950s different broad communications businesses started showcasing music, motion pictures, TV projects, and PC programming on a worldwide level.
(12-6)/12 gives you the growth rate *over five years* (115%)
divide that by 5 and you get an average rate of 23% growth per year.
If we’re rounding, yes, that statement is correct. Otherwise, growth over five years doubled because there was a growth of 115% and year-over-year growth was 23%.
Due to the greatest cost of goods sold, the LIFO (Last In Last Out) technique displays the lowest net profitability. Compared to the other techniques of inventory valuation, the cost of goods sold for the LIFO approach is the greatest.
<h3>Which technique of inventory valuation will result in the lowest net profit?</h3>
The application of LIFO will produce the lowest net income and the greatest estimated cost of goods sold among the three options during periods of inflation.
<h3>Which method of inventory has the lowest income tax rate?</h3>
LIFO is the inventory cost flow method that yields the lowest income tax liability. A form of inventory cost flow mechanism called last-in-first-out (LIFO) operates under the presumption that the last item acquired will be the first item to be sold.
<h3>In an era of inflation, which inventory method results in the lowest income tax?</h3>
Due to increasing COGS, LIFO leads to reduced net income (and taxes). However, under LIFO during inflation, there are fewer inventory write-downs. Results from average cost are in the middle of FIFO and LIFO.
To Know more about techniques
brainly.com/question/13655064
#SPJ4
The National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association (NHCAA) estimates that the financial losses due to health care fraud are in the tens of billions of dollars each year.
Whether you have employer-sponsored health insurance or you purchase your own insurance policy, health care fraud inevitably translates into higher premiums and out-of-pocket expenses for consumers, as well as reduced benefits or coverage. For employers-private and government alike-health care fraud increases the cost of providing insurance benefits to employees and, in turn, increases the overall cost of doing business. For many Americans, the increased expense resulting from fraud could mean the difference between making health insurance a reality or not.
However, financial losses caused by health care fraud are only part of the story. Health care fraud has a human face too. Individual victims of health care fraud are sadly easy to find. These are people who are exploited and subjected to unnecessary or unsafe medical procedures. Or whose medical records are compromised or whose legitimate insurance information is used to submit falsified claims.
<span>Don't be fooled into thinking that health care fraud is a victimless crime. There is no doubt that health care fraud can have devastating effects.</span>
It can influence it to be better
