This is the scenario for this question:
Mr. Youngher arrives at his interview for a community relations internship with Bethlehem Electric in Chicago five minutes late and in a rumpled suit. When he is introduced to the chief marketing officer, Mr.Youngher moves in close as they shake hands and winks. The executive takes a step back
Answer:
He should learn to appreciate the power of appearance and improve his decoding skills to be a better reader of others’ reactions.
Explanation:
In the given scenario it is obvious that Mr Youngher did not read the situation and act appropriately.
He came late for the meeting. The correct thing for him to do would have been to apologize.
Instead he moves in close as they shake hands and winks. This kind of familiarity is inappropriate under the circumstances.
Also he went to the interview with a rumpled suit.
This would give a bad impression about himself.
He should learn that a neat appearance creates a good impression about people, this helps them rate you higher
Answer:
The correct answer is B) it eliminates all the unpopular items for the analysis to save time (and computing power).
Explanation:
Taking into account that the analysis of the association rule takes into account a group of products that are sold for being complementary or that are sold from the purchase of others without being complementary, in a retail business it will be relevant to consider the popularity of products to determine behavior or pattern. In this sense, the "a priori" algorithm determines a previous situation that is not taken into account to study similar behaviors between products.
Economic profit is calculated as:
Economic profit = Total Revenues – Total Cost
Total cost both includes explicit and implicit cost. In
this case, the explicit cost is $8,000 while the implicit cost is $64,000.
Explicit cost is a direct payment made to run the business while implicit cost
is the opportunity as accountant that is lost. Therefore,
Economic profit = $150,000 – ($8,000 + $64,000)
<span>Economic profit = $78,000</span>
Reliability because it shows that you are responsible to pay
6.4%
200 from the 5% of 4000
140 from 4% on 3500
160 on 6.4% on 2500
