Political scientist Richard Neustadt contended that an effective president is successful in using t<u>he power to persuade,</u>
<u />
Thus Neustadt's thesis: Presidential strength isn't the power to direct but the strength to influence. The president can not accomplish a lot by using merely issuing orders. Getting things finished requires persuading others that appearing to enhance the president's dreams is in their own first-rate interest.
Richard Elliott Neustadt (June 26, 1919 – October 31, 2003) became an American political scientist specializing in the united states of America presidency. He also served as an adviser to several presidents. He becomes the writer of the books Presidential electricity and, with Harvey V.
The constitution specifies two assets of presidential power: Expressed powers consist of the strength to make treaties, provide pardons and nominate judges.
Learn more about Neustadt's thesis here: brainly.com/question/13520540
#SPJ4
<u />
<u />
<u />
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
If you refer to the Asoka’s rock pillars edicts, then we can say that what do we have today that is similar to Asoka’s rock pillars edicts is the Constitution.
These pillars in Ashoka are columns located in some areas of India. These pillars have edicts inscribed that tried to solve some issues of the time and left a record of the history of Emperor Ashoka and his change to Buddhism. These columns can be found in what today are the territories of Pakistan, India, Afghanistan, Nepal, and Bangladesh.
Answer:
Answer: A parachute landing fall (PLF) is a safety technique that allows a parachutist to land safely and without injury. ... When executed properly, this technique is capable of allowing a parachutist to survive uninjured during landing speeds that would otherwise cause severe injury or even death.
Explanation:
cant make the diagram but
Answer: It is called irresistible impulse standard.
Explanation:
In criminal law, irresistible impulse is a defense by excuse, in this case some sort of insanity, in which the individual states that they should not be held criminally responsible for their actions that broke the law, because they were not able to control those actions, even if they knew them to be wrong.
I would think either the Indians or cavemen