The correct answer is negative
Explanation: Negative reinforcement is a term described by BF Skinner operant conditioning theory. In negative reinforcement, a response or behavior is reinforced by stopping, removing or avoiding a negative result or aversive stimulus.
<em>
Aversive stimuli</em> tend to involve some kind of discomfort, whether physical or psychological. Behaviors are negatively reinforced when they allow you to escape aversive stimuli that are already present or allow you to avoid aversive stimuli completely before they happen.
Answer:
it think the 3 option but im not sure
The 2010s saw more people being born than the 1950s is true
Answer:
Personal Opportunity Cost - Spare non drive time sacrifised
Social Opportunity Cost - Fuel efficiency (high pollution), Road Traffic (Congestion issues).
Explanation:
Opportunity Cost is the cost of next best alternative, foregone while choosing an alternative. Bill can commute either by bus, or by self drive.
If Bill drives his car, opportunity cost for him is - the spare time sacrifised, that he could have used while car drive in some other activity (eg reading, listening music).
Opportunity Cost for society is - the fuel utilisation & road traffic management efficiency sacrifised, by using private instead of public transport. This leads to more pollution, more congestion on roads.
Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Which professional tenet has the educator violated? Would be: Protecting students from any practice that harms, or has the potential to harm, students.
Explanation:
The reason for this being the answer comes from the very principle placed in the question: Principle II: Responsibility for Professional Competence: C: The professional educator acts in the best interest of all students.
In this scenario, specifically, the educator finds herself with the situation of a student that she has learned places that student in direct danger. He has to walk home every day and go through a portion of town where gang problems are present. Not only that, but she learns that her student has had to face fights with these gang members on several ocassions, which means that her student has faced not only harm, but the danger of becoming involved with gangs. Instead of acting as she should have professionally, which was to seek the best steps to help the student resolve his issue, she decides to only tell him to be careful and never says anything about the case. This completely violates her duty as a teacher to protect her students and ensure that potential harming situations are dealt with appropriately.
