To live life fully, one must take risks BEST expresses the theme of the poem.
A) To live life fully, one must take risks.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Facing a challenge to accomplish an objective requires the fortitude to confront the dread of vulnerability. Regardless of the result, in any case, we develop through the procedure and become stronger and sure.
Even better, constructing those aptitudes helps in facing more challenges and improves the odds of accomplishing future objectives since the artist additionally, isn't worried about the powerless and the solid. So to live to the fullest methods confronting your apprehensions with boldness, a receptive outlook, and an absence of bias.
Answer:
There were a lot of people at the museum
Oscar started to worry about the test
When the cops arrived, the criminal ran outside
He checked his cell phone for any messages
Fighting, wars, arguments, violence
Answer:
Language can be called arbitrary because, Words do not inherently resemble the objects that they represent and The word chair does not resemble the object it represents.
Explanation:
Languages are Arbitrary means that there is no relationship between the words that we use and the natural meaning of that particular word.
Words do not inherently resemble the objects that they represent. There are certain words which might be meaningless to some, but those are the exact words which are understood by many. Say for example, the word ‘chair’ doesn’t necessarily resemble the object it represents. It doesn’t tell us anything about what exactly the kind or type of object it is referring to.
Sentence 6: Some people believe that the government does not have the right to force people to be safe, and that these laws are unfair.
The counterargument in an essay is the argument that a person would make against the essay's overall claim. In this essay, the author is arguing for consistent seat belt laws across all states for both drivers and passengers. The author wants the government to get involved because seat belts save lives. The counterargument contradicts the author in that it argues that the government should not be the one deciding whether or not a person should be wearing a seat belt. Laws for seat belts are unfair as they infringe upon a person's rights.
