It should be noted that cost-benefit analysis is the way to compare the costs and benefits of a project expressed in monetary units.
<h3>
What Is a Cost-Benefit Analysis?</h3>
A cost-benefit analysis is the systematic process which businesses use on order to analyze which decisions to make and the ones that will be forgo. The cost-benefit analyst simply sums the potential rewards that are expected from a situation and then subtracts the total costs that are associated with taking that action.
The major steps in a cost-benefit analysis
- Specify the set of options.
- Decide whose costs and benefits count.
- Identify the impacts and select measurement indicators.
- Predict the impacts over the life of the proposed regulation.
- Monetize and place dollar values on impacts.
Before the class goes on a field trip to Walt Disney World in Orlando, it's important to conduct a cost-benefit analysis that will be used to evaluate all the potential costs and the revenues which the class might generate from the project.
Then, the outcome that is gotten from the analysis will determine whether the project will be financially feasible or whether the company can pursue another project.
Learn more about cost-benefit analysis on:
brainly.com/question/12530168
#SPJ1
The better the IRR, the better. but, a corporation may additionally decide on a mission with a decreased IRR as it has other intangible advantages, together with contributing to a larger strategic plan or impeding competition.
Solution:
NPV of Project S= -$1,000 +$895.03/(1+10.5%) + $250//(1+10.5%)^2 +$10//(1+10.5%)^3 +$5//(1+10.5%)^4 =25.49320776
IRR of Project S= -$1,000 +$895.03/(1+r%) + $250//(1+r%)^2 +$10//(1+r%)^3 +$5//(1+r%)^4 =0
IRR =12.80%
NPV of Project L = -$1,000+ $5/(1+10.5%) +$260/(1+10.5%)^2 + $420/(1+10.5%)^3 + $802.50/(1+10.5%)^4
=$67.01
IRR of Project L=
-$1,000+ $5/(1+r%) +$260/(1+r%)^2 + $420/(1+r%)^3 + $802.50/(1+r%)^4 =0
IRR =12.700%
Project L is better than Project S since L has higher NPV
IRR of Project L is 12.7%.
Learn more about IRR here:-brainly.com/question/28428807
#SPJ4
Answer:
1.- Without Retrospective effect
2.- No as it comes from a change in estimations not an accounting error.
3.- yes. It will give a full explanation about the reasons to extend the useful life.
4.- Depreciation expense for 2021: 60,000
Explanation:
1.- The change in the useful life does not represent an accounting error. It comes from the estimation process.
800,000 - 160,000 x 2 = 480,000 book value at beginning 2021
480,000 / 8 new useful life = 60,000 depreciation per year.
Answer:
Value of the bond = $862.013
Explanation:
The value of the bond is the present value of the future cash receipts expected from the bond. The value is equal to present values of interest payment and the redemption value (RV).
Value of Bond = PV of interest + PV of RV
The value of the bond can be worked out as follows:
Step 1
<em>Calculate the PV of Interest payment
</em>
Present value of the interest payment
PV = Interest payment × (1- (1+r)^(-n))/r
Interest payment = $40
PV = 40 × (1 - (1.05)^(-12×2)/0.05)
= 40 × 13.7986
= 551.945
Step 2
<em>PV of redemption Value
</em>
PV of RV = RV × (1+r)^(-n)
= 1000 × (1.05)^(-12×2)
= 310.067
Step 3
<em>Calculate Value of the bond </em>
= 551.94567 + 310.067
=862.01
Value of the bond = $862.013
Answer:
B. False
Explanation:
As the name suggests that crowdfunding refers to the funding for a project by having a small amount from the public at large in an internet
Since in the question it is mentioned that the founders should put efforts for giving the high stake of ownership with respect to high contributors before raising the funds to launch a product in the market
But this above requirement should not be necessary
Therefore the given statement is false
