Answer:
I feel like climate change is dangerous because storms, rising sea levels, heatwaves, cold waves, hurricanes, etc can hurt animals and us humans. For Example, heat can cause heat strokes and hot waters. Hot water can hurt the sea animals because hurts them and also destroy their homes. Climate change gets worse every year and there are ways to stop them. We just have to do our part. For Example, we can power our homes with renewable energy, better lightbulbs, and more! I think that climate change is a big thing and sometimes can't be controlled but it never hurts to try. Another example, high wave levels are super dangerous, the waves can hurt the animals and if waves get too high the waves can hurt our homes as well. Even if we humans can't feel when a storm is coming our dogs can sense barometric pressure changes. I hope you understand why I think climate change is dangerous.
Hope that helps! If needed you can change anything to make it sound more like you.
Explanation:
Answer:
He believes that all living things are important.
Explanation:
According to the excerpt from "Birdfoot's Grampa" by Joseph Bruchae, the author speaks about "leathery hands full of wet brown life" that are knee-deep in the summer grass to which the narrator smiled and said that they have places to go too.
When the author says "they have places to go to too", he means that he believes that all living things are important.
Answer:
Argumentative writing → An essay argues that light on the field would add to the quality of life in the community.
Claim → The soccer field would get more use because the lights would allow night games.
Counterclaim → Some people think it is not worth the expense
Evidence → According to a poll, more than one third of the citizens approve the cost of adding lights to the soccer field
Reasoning → Our town should place lights near the soccer fields so teams can play at night.
Explanation:
I have been able to place each sentence to the correct term.
An essay that argues on a subject is usually classified to be argumentative writing. The statement claimed that "<em>The soccer field would get more use because the lights would allow night games</em>". This is actually a claim. But an opposition to the claim is known as counterclaim. So, when "<em>Some people think it is not worth the expense</em>", then it is counterclaim.
Then an evidence was given which we see from the poll that was carried out. Evidence usually comes with facts and data which is what the poll provided.
The speaker actually reasoned or thought that their "<em>...town should place lights near the soccer fields so teams can play at night</em>". This is reasoning.
The answer is the first one
