Answer:
C) The order in which events happened
Explanation:
When a text is written in chronological order, the events described in it are arranged in the order they take place.
For example, if a scientific article tells about a certain historical period, it should be written in chronological order because that is the only way we will properly understand it. We wouldn't be able to properly connect events if the article first told about something that happened in 1700, then about something from 1600, and finally about something from 1750.
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
From the options given in the question, the sentence that is written grammatically correct is option D.
A grammatically correct sentence is the one in which subject and verb agree in terms of number, punctuation marks are correctly put, and formed correctly.
<u>The statement in option D is grammatically correct, as quotation marks are correctly put in the sentence. The dialogue begins with double quotation mark and single quotation is used to indicate another text within the dialogue</u>.
Thus option D is correct.
In this excerpt of his speech, Wiesel encourages the world to 'take sides' and work to end suffering (A).
He does not want people to be passive and simply stay neutral (C) or on the sidelines (B). He wants people to take position: "I swore never to be silent," "We must always take sides." Through parallelism, he also blames inaction for feeding into the problem: "Neutrality helps the oppressor" // "Silence encourages the tormentor."
Neither does he believe that thinking about race, religion or political views (D) is enough. He is urging people to take action to defend citizens from discrimination. This is shown by the use of the action verb "interfere."
D. subjective noun!
If you view examples of the seven line poem, you can identify that the top line is more than likely a subjective noun.
Answer:
A) A poor mentor is worse than having no mentor at all
Explanation:
Hope this was helpful
